Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC vs Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC
Side-by-side federal contract comparison from USASpending data
Verdict
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC receives $181.3M more in federal contracts than Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC ($3.6B vs $3.5B). Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC ranks #21 among federal contractors. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC's top agency is Department of Energy, while Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC's is Department of Energy.
| Metric | Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC | Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations | $3.6B* | $3.5B |
| Total Awards | 1 | 2 |
| Contract Count | 1 | 2 |
| Grant Count | 0 | 0 |
| Rank Rank among all federal contractors by total obligations | #21* | #23 |
| Top Agency | Department of Energy | Department of Energy |
| States |
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC receives $181.3M more in federal contracts than Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC ($3.6B vs $3.5B). Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC ranks #21 among federal contractors. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC's top agency is Department of Energy, while Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC's is Department of Energy.
Explore More
Comparing entity A and entity B on U.S. federal government spending requires lining up the underlying USASpending.gov federal awards data data side by side. The table above runs the comparison on the canonical fields; the narrative below identifies the factor or factors that drive the most meaningful difference between the two.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: USAspending.gov, 2026.