Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC vs Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC
Side-by-side federal contract comparison from USASpending data
Verdict
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC receives $181.3M more in federal contracts than Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC ($3.6B vs $3.5B). Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC ranks #22 among federal contractors. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC's top agency is Department of Energy, while Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC's is Department of Energy.
| Metric | Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC | Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations | $3.6B* | $3.5B |
| Total Awards | 1 | 2 |
| Contract Count | 1 | 2 |
| Grant Count | 0 | 0 |
| Rank Rank among all federal contractors by total obligations | #22* | #24 |
| Top Agency | Department of Energy | Department of Energy |
| States |
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC receives $181.3M more in federal contracts than Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC ($3.6B vs $3.5B). Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC ranks #22 among federal contractors. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC's top agency is Department of Energy, while Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC's is Department of Energy.
Explore More
Comparing Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC and Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC on U.S. federal government spending requires lining up the underlying USASpending.gov federal awards data data side by side. The table above runs the comparison on the canonical fields; the narrative below identifies the factor or factors that drive the most meaningful difference between the two.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC and Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: USAspending.gov, 2026.