Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC vs Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC
Side-by-side federal contract comparison from USASpending data
Verdict
Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC receives $301.2M more in federal contracts than Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ($3.5B vs $3.2B). Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC ranks #24 among federal contractors. Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC's top agency is Department of Energy, while Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC's is N/A.
| Metric | Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC | Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations | $3.5B* | $3.2B |
| Total Awards | 2 | 1 |
| Contract Count | 2 | 1 |
| Grant Count | 0 | 0 |
| Rank Rank among all federal contractors by total obligations | #24* | #28 |
| Top Agency | Department of Energy | N/A |
| States |
Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC receives $301.2M more in federal contracts than Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ($3.5B vs $3.2B). Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC ranks #24 among federal contractors. Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC's top agency is Department of Energy, while Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC's is N/A.
Explore More
Comparing Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC on U.S. federal government spending requires lining up the underlying USASpending.gov federal awards data data side by side. The table above runs the comparison on the canonical fields; the narrative below identifies the factor or factors that drive the most meaningful difference between the two.
For households or analysts using this comparison as a decision input, the right framing is usually not "which is better" in aggregate but "which is better for the specific decision in front of you." USASpending.gov federal awards data captures the raw data; the framing depends on whether the question is investment, residency, planning, or research.
Source: USAspending.gov, 2026.