Science Applications International Corporation vs Deloitte Consulting Llp
Side-by-side federal contract comparison from USASpending data
Verdict
Science Applications International Corporation receives $1.4B more in federal contracts than Deloitte Consulting Llp ($4.7B vs $3.3B). Science Applications International Corporation ranks #20 among federal contractors. Science Applications International Corporation's top agency is N/A, while Deloitte Consulting Llp's is General Services Administration.
| Metric | Science Applications International Corporation | Deloitte Consulting Llp |
|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations | $4.7B* | $3.3B |
| Total Awards | 1 | 25 |
| Contract Count | 1 | 25 |
| Grant Count | 0 | 0 |
| Rank Rank among all federal contractors by total obligations | #20* | #27 |
| Top Agency | N/A | General Services Administration |
| States |
Science Applications International Corporation receives $1.4B more in federal contracts than Deloitte Consulting Llp ($4.7B vs $3.3B). Science Applications International Corporation ranks #20 among federal contractors. Science Applications International Corporation's top agency is N/A, while Deloitte Consulting Llp's is General Services Administration.
Explore More
Comparing entity A and entity B on U.S. federal government spending requires lining up the underlying USASpending.gov federal awards data data side by side. The table above runs the comparison on the canonical fields; the narrative below identifies the factor or factors that drive the most meaningful difference between the two.
For households or analysts using this comparison as a decision input, the right framing is usually not "which is better" in aggregate but "which is better for the specific decision in front of you." USASpending.gov federal awards data captures the raw data; the framing depends on whether the question is investment, residency, planning, or research.
Source: USAspending.gov, 2026.