Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #566
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRBM TARGETS | Department of Defense | Oct 31, 2013 | $1.1B |
| MINIMUM AWARD STUDY | Department of Defense | Jan 31, 2024 | $40K |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Inc. has received $137,476,579 in total federal obligations across 2 awards and 2 contracts.
Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Inc. is ranked #566 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.