Agile Defense, LLC
Federal Contractor · Rank #480
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGF::CT::IGF DARPA MISSION SYSTEMS OFFICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE IT SYSTEMS SERVICES AND SUPPORT TASK ORDER. | Department of Defense | Feb 13, 2015 | $225.2M |
| IT SERVICE OPERATIONS | Department of Defense | Sep 27, 2019 | $108.6M |
| RESERVED | Department of Defense | Feb 14, 2018 | $105.9M |
| CAOC COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT "IGF::OT::IGF" | General Services Administration | Jul 26, 2014 | $84.3M |
| GLOBAL APPLICATION DELIVERY NETWORK | Department of Defense | May 5, 2022 | $56.2M |
| INVENTORY (PHASE 1) -- SERVICES | Department of Defense | Aug 15, 2022 | $56.1M |
| IGF::CT::IGF LABOR | Department of Defense | Aug 24, 2016 | $52.5M |
| TASK ORDER W15P7T-23-F-0088 IS ISSUED ON A FIRM FIXED PRICE, COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE TERM, AND COST NO FEE UNDER THE RS3 IDIQ CONTRACT FOR PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) TITLED B08-RS3-21-0027 MISSION COMMAND SUPPORT CENTER NETWORK OPERATIONS CENTER. | Department of Defense | Apr 28, 2023 | $47.1M |
| PEO AVN - LABOR BASE PERIOD & TRANSITION | Department of Defense | Nov 29, 2021 | $45.7M |
| PEO MISSILES AND SPACE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Jul 1, 2021 | $44.0M |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES | Department of Defense | Aug 2, 2021 | $28.7M |
| IGF::CT::IGF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Jan 30, 2015 | $24.0M |
| SERVICE ARE RENDERED VIA ARMY CHESS ITES-3S CONTRACT VEHICLE. ALTHOUGH IDIQ IS NON-COMMERCIAL, IT STIPULATES COMMERCIAL CONTRACT CLAUSES ARE INCLUDED IN THE BASE CONTRACT AS TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER ITES-3S MAY BE COMMERCIAL. | Department of Defense | Jun 16, 2020 | $21.0M |
| IT PROJECT SUPPORT AND SUSTAINMENT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Nov 1, 2021 | $16.8M |
| IT SERVICES WITH A BASE AND FOUR OPTION YEARS. | Department of Defense | Feb 2, 2020 | $15.7M |
| FUNDING FOR IT SUPPORT SERVICE (LABOR) | Department of Defense | Nov 13, 2020 | $15.6M |
| TSIF SYSTEMS INVENTORY & INTEGRATION (TSII) SERVICES. | Department of Homeland Security | Sep 29, 2021 | $14.1M |
| OPERATIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING SUPPORT, SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND SOFTWARE ENHANCEMENT OF THE REGIONAL LEVEL APPLICATION SOFTWARE (RLAS) AND THE RLAS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION. | General Services Administration | Nov 16, 2021 | $13.7M |
| INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (IV&V) SUPPORT SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF | Department of Housing and Urban Development | Aug 11, 2016 | $10.9M |
| DISA REQUIRES SERVICES FOR IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (IDAM) SUPPORT FOR DISA'S SERVICES DIRECTORATE. IDAM IS A SERVICE PORTFOLIO OF A COMBINATION OF TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, RULES, AND PROCEDURES THAT DEFINE THE OWNERSHIP, UTILIZATION, SAFEGUARDING OF PERSONAL IDENTITY INFORMATION, AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL OF THE WAY IN WHICH ENTITIES ARE GRANTED ACCESS TO RESOURCES. | Department of Defense | Jun 20, 2018 | $10.3M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Agile Defense, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ
Agile Defense, LLC has received $163,148,643 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Agile Defense, LLC works with 4 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, General Services Administration, Department of Homeland Security. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Agile Defense, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.
Agile Defense, LLC is ranked #480 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.