Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC
Federal Contractor · Rank #273
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT | Department of Defense | Mar 7, 2019 | $562.2M |
| AGM-88E AARGM ALL UP ROUND (AUR) | Department of Defense | Jul 29, 2019 | $351.3M |
| AGM-88G AARGM-ER LRIP LOT 3 | Department of Defense | Nov 28, 2023 | $237.9M |
| IGF::OT::IGF CARTRIDGE, 120MM, ADVANCED MULTI-PURPOSE (AMP), XM1147, HIGH EXPLOSIVE MULTI-PURPOSE WITH TRACER (HEMP-T) | Department of Defense | Jul 28, 2015 | $223.6M |
| AWARD FISCAL YEAR 2017 120MM TANK TRAINING AMMUNITION REQUIREMENTS. OPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS 18-21 REQUIREMENTS AVAILABLE TO BE EXERCISED. | Department of Defense | Mar 29, 2017 | $222.9M |
| LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT (LCAAP) PRODUCTION AWARD FOR SMALL CALIBER AMMUNITION (5.56MM REFERENCE ROUNDS AND ASSOCIATED TESTING). | Department of Defense | Feb 14, 2019 | $221.3M |
| AWARD OF PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (PBS) EFFORTS FOR LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT (LCAAP) | Department of Defense | Jul 30, 2013 | $209.5M |
| AGM-88E AARGM ALL UP ROUND (AUR) | Department of Defense | Aug 3, 2021 | $179.3M |
| AGM-88G AARGM-ER ALL UP ROUND (AUR) | Department of Defense | Sep 14, 2021 | $149.1M |
| TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT-TD | Department of Defense | Jun 28, 2006 | $129.5M |
| AWARD MODERNIZATION OF CAL .50 FRONT END BULLET MANUFACTURING PROCESS. | Department of Defense | Sep 18, 2013 | $119.2M |
| ACAT III BIG SAFARI AFGHANISTAN AC-208 | Department of Defense | Mar 9, 2018 | $84.0M |
| GERMANY BLOCK 1 SOFTWARE UPGRADE | Department of Defense | Oct 15, 2020 | $56.5M |
| MK419 MOD 1 MULTI FUNCTION FUZE PROD | Department of Defense | Mar 27, 2020 | $37.2M |
| FACILITIES RESTORATION | Department of Defense | Apr 5, 2011 | $35.3M |
| MSI SBIR REQUIREMENTS, TRADE STUDIES, DESIGN ANALYSIS | Department of Defense | Nov 27, 2017 | $35.2M |
| FY25 LRIP AUR AND CATM LONG LEAD MATERIALS | Department of Defense | Sep 23, 2024 | $33.3M |
| ANTI-TERRORISM AND FORCE PROTECTION | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2009 | $30.8M |
| ENHANCED PERFORMANCE ROUNDS (EPR) PROJECTS (SERVICES) RELATED TO LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT. | Department of Defense | Feb 3, 2014 | $30.3M |
| LEBANON SUSTAINMENT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Jul 1, 2019 | $22.4M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC Federal Contracts FAQ
Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC has received $309,860,390 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.
Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC is ranked #273 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.