Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Arctec Alaska Jv

Federal Contractor · Rank #1867

Total Federal Spending
$39.8M
$39,768,474
Total Obligations
1
Total Awards
1
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
IGF::CT::IGF OPERATION&MAINTENANCE OF ALASKA RADAR SYSTEMDepartment of DefenseOct 1, 2015$424.5M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Arctec Alaska Jv Federal Contracts FAQ

Arctec Alaska Jv has received $39,768,474 in total federal obligations across 1 awards and 1 contracts.

Arctec Alaska Jv works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Arctec Alaska Jv has received federal awards in multiple states.

Arctec Alaska Jv is ranked #1867 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.