Bae Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #206
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRP-12+ WGU-59A/B GUIDANCE SECTIONS | Department of Defense | Dec 19, 2023 | $430.4M |
| FRP 8 DELIVERY FOR WGU-59/B GUIDANCE SECTIONS | Department of Defense | Sep 25, 2019 | $329.6M |
| FRP-9 WGU-59/B GUIDANCE SECTIONS | Department of Defense | Sep 25, 2019 | $243.3M |
| FRP-12 WGU-59A/B GUIDANCE SECTIONS | Department of Defense | May 3, 2023 | $162.0M |
| FRP-11 WGU-59A/B GUIDANCE SECTIONS | Department of Defense | Apr 29, 2022 | $108.6M |
| FRP-10 WGU-59/B GUIDANCE SECTIONS | Department of Defense | Apr 15, 2021 | $106.3M |
| DARPA JANUS PROGRAM | Department of Defense | Nov 28, 2022 | $82.6M |
| DARPA RESEARCH PROGRAM | Department of Defense | Feb 26, 2021 | $71.0M |
| IGF::OT::IGF CAMBRIDGE PHASE 4 BAE | Department of Defense | Apr 28, 2017 | $50.1M |
| DARPA ELECTRA "ARGOS" BASE + IT PHASE 1 | Department of Defense | Apr 7, 2020 | $44.9M |
| CAMBRIDGE | Department of Defense | Oct 22, 2012 | $41.2M |
| TASK ORDER 0002 AWARD UNDER INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE CONTRACT W56KGY-16-D-0013 FOR TACTICAL SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE PAYLOAD INTERIM CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT. THIS PARTICULAR EFFORT FUNDS SUSTAINMENT AND OPERATIONS. | Department of Defense | Jan 25, 2019 | $38.3M |
| THE GOAL OF THE ADAPTIVE RADAR COUNTERMEASURES (ARC) PROGRAM IS TO DEVELOP THE CAPABILITY TO COUNTER ADAPTIVE RADAR THREATS IN TACTICALLY RELEVANT TIME FRAMES BASED ON OVER-THE-AIR OBSERVABLE SIGNALS. AN ADAPTIVE THREAT IS DEFINED AS AN ADVERSARY S RADAR WHOSE WAVEFORMS AND BEHAVIORS ARE NEW, UNKNOWN, OR AMBIGUOUS. THREATS OF PARTICULAR INTEREST INCLUDE GROUND-TO-AIR AND AIR-TO-AIR PHASED ARRAY RADARS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS (E.G., SURVEILLANCE, CUED TARGET ACQUISITION, TRACKING, NON-COOPERATIVE TARGET IDENTIFICATION, MISSILE TRACK, ETC.) AND EXHIBITING A HIGH DEGREE OF AGILITY IN BEAM STEERING, WAVEFORM, AND COHERENT PROCESSING INTERVAL (CPI) CHARACTERISTICS (E.G., CODING, PULSE REPETITION INTERVAL [PRI], ETC.). THE KEY CHALLENGES TO COUNTERING RADAR THREATS ARE: (1) UNAMBIGUOUSLY ISOLATING THE SIGNAL IN THE PRESENCE OF OTHER HOSTILE, FRIENDLY AND NEUTRAL SIGNALS; (2)DEDUCING THE THREAT POSED BY THAT SIGNAL; AND (3) SYNTHESIZING AND TRANSMITTING A COUNTERMEASURE THAT ACHIEVES A DESIRED EFFECT WITHIN THE RADAR S SIGNAL PROCESSOR. TODAY S AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) SYSTEMS RELY ON A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE OF THE THREAT ENVIRONMENT IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY THESE TASKS. WHEN A SIGNAL IS DETECTED, ITS CHARACTERISTICS ARE COMPARED TO A LIST OF RADAR SIGNALS THAT WERE DEEMED TO BE POTENTIAL THREATS IN THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OF OPERATION (I.E., A LOAD SET). IF A MATCH IS FOUND, THEN THE EW SYSTEM IS ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE THREAT AND APPLY AN APPROPRIATE PRE-PROGRAMMED COUNTERMEASURE (CM) THAT WAS DEVELOPED OFFLINE BY SKILLED ANALYSTS AND ENGINEERS, AND TESTED VIA SIMULATION AND RANGE TESTING (WHEN POSSIBLE). WHEN THE SIGNALS DETECTED IN THEATER ARE AMBIGUOUS OR DO NOT MATCH THE WAVEFORMS IN THE CURRENT LOAD SET, LIMITED REAL-TIME, ADAPTIVE RESPONSES ARE AVAILABLE TODAY. AS RADARS EVOLVE FROM FIXED ANALOG SYSTEMS TO DIGITALLY PROGRAMMABLE VARIANTS WITH UNKNOWN BEHAVIORS AND AGILE WAVEFORM CHARACTERISTICS, IDENTIFYING RADAR SYSTEMS IS BECOMING INCREASINGLY CHALLENGING. FUTURE RADARS PRESENT AN EVEN GREATER CHALLENGE AS THEY ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO SENSE THEIR ENVIRONMENT AND ADAPT THEIR TRANSMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND PULSE PROCESSING ALGORITHMS TO MAXIMIZE PERFORMANCE AND MITIGATE INTERFERENCE EFFECTS. THE RESULT IS THAT OUR EW SYSTEMS WILL INCREASINGLY ENCOUNTER ADAPTIVE RADAR THREATS. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ARC PROGRAM IS TO ENABLE OUR EW SYSTEMS TO AUTOMATICALLY GENERATE EFFECTIVE COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST NEW, UNKNOWN, OR AMBIGUOUS RADAR SIGNALS IN NEAR REAL-TIME (I.E., AS THEY ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING A MISSION). | Department of Defense | Mar 15, 2013 | $36.5M |
| SEEKER COST TRANSFORMATION | Department of Defense | Jul 31, 2022 | $35.3M |
| MERCURY | Department of Defense | Sep 27, 2019 | $26.7M |
| BAA OVERRSIGHT PROGRAM | Department of Defense | Jan 3, 2023 | $22.0M |
| THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO PERFORM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TO IMPROVE THE DENSITY, PERFORMANCE AND POWER CONSUMPTION OF FUTURE SPACE-SYSTEM MEMORY BY ADAPTING AND HARDENING ADVANCED STATE-OF-ART TECHNOLOGIES. | Department of Defense | Jun 18, 2019 | $21.6M |
| COMMUNICATIONS UNDER EXTREME RF SPECTRUM CONDITIONS (COMMEX) | Department of Defense | Mar 31, 2011 | $21.2M |
| THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE RADIO SYSTEM OF THE TACTICAL BOOST GLIDE (TBG) PROGRAM. | Department of Defense | Dec 11, 2020 | $16.8M |
| IGF::OT::IGF ARRAY BUILDING BLOCK ENABLED BY MATRICS (ABEAM) | Department of Defense | Jul 7, 2017 | $15.1M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Bae Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Bae Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc. has received $430,612,120 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Bae Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Bae Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Bae Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc. is ranked #206 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.