Bavarian Nordic A/s
Federal Contractor · Rank #359
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGF::OT::IGF | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 27, 2017 | $1.2B |
| END POINT TITER ANALYSIS SERVICES FOR USAMRIID | Department of Defense | Sep 29, 2023 | - |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Bavarian Nordic A/s Federal Contracts FAQ
Bavarian Nordic A/s has received $222,920,837 in total federal obligations across 2 awards and 2 contracts.
Bavarian Nordic A/s works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Bavarian Nordic A/s has received federal awards in multiple states.
Bavarian Nordic A/s is ranked #359 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.