Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Bluehalo, LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #863

Total Federal Spending
$89.7M
$89,729,831
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOMATERIALS R&D AND EXPLORATIONDepartment of DefenseJun 15, 2022$29.7M
PETIC ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND VISIONARY SYSTEMS SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROGRAMDepartment of DefenseMay 13, 2019$26.8M
MOLECULAR AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE THREAT ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGIES TO SUSTAIN AND OPTIMIZE AIRMAN READINESSDepartment of DefenseMay 5, 2021$26.0M
AIRMEN IMPROVED READINESSDepartment of DefenseSep 13, 2023$23.7M
ADVANCED CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALSDepartment of DefenseJan 3, 2018$20.7M
CERAMIC ADVANCED MATERIALS AND PROCESSES (CAMP)Department of DefenseSep 30, 2021$19.4M
PERSONNEL PROTECTION AGAINST OCULAR THREATSDepartment of DefenseDec 22, 2021$15.0M
BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR HUMAN HEALTH AND PERFORMANCEDepartment of DefenseSep 20, 2023$14.3M
ADVANCED MICRO CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALS (AMCOM)Department of DefenseAug 18, 2023$12.0M
TECHNICAL OPERATIONS VIDepartment of DefenseAug 22, 2022$12.0M
ENGINEERED BIOSENSORS FOR ASSESSMENT OF AUGMENTATION OF HUMAN PERORMANCEDepartment of DefenseAug 26, 2019$11.8M
IGF::OT::IGF ENGINEERED BIOSENSORS FOR ASSESSMENT AND AUGMENTATION OF HUMAN PERFORMANCEDepartment of DefenseAug 23, 2016$10.9M
IGF::OT::IGF-TOTAL EXPOSURE HEALTH- NEW CONTRACT OFF OPEN, OPEN BAADepartment of DefenseAug 9, 2017$10.6M
COUNTER DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON (C-DEW) DEVELOPMENT FOR TACTDepartment of DefenseFeb 3, 2020$10.0M
MATERIALS RESPONSE IN RAPID HEATING ENVIRONMENTSDepartment of DefenseMar 3, 2022$10.0M
MATERIALS RESPONSE IN RAPID HEATING ENVIRONMENTSDepartment of DefenseDec 17, 2020$10.0M
IGF::OT::IGF NEMO: ADVANCING M&P FOR RF ELECTRONIC DEVICESDepartment of DefenseSep 28, 2017$10.0M
NEXT-GENERATION PHOTONIC, OPTOELECTRONIC, AND QUANTUM MATERIALS AND PROCESSES FOR ADVANCED ISR TECHNOLOGIESDepartment of DefenseDec 30, 2020$9.9M
LASER MATERIALS FOR BLUE SYSTEMS SURVIVABILITY (LAMBSS) NOVEL MATERIALS FOR TACTICAL SENSORS AND STRUCTURES SURVIVABILITYDepartment of DefenseJun 10, 2022$9.8M
IGF::OT::IGF MATERIAL SPACE EFFECTS CHARACTERIZATION AND RESEARCHDepartment of DefenseJan 22, 2018$9.2M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Bluehalo, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Bluehalo, LLC has received $89,729,831 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Bluehalo, LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Bluehalo, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Bluehalo, LLC is ranked #863 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.