Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #1848

Total Federal Spending
$40.3M
$40,313,104
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
2
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CLSDepartment of DefenseApr 1, 2007$614.8M
MISSION PLANNING STRIKE AGILE EFFORTS.Department of DefenseJan 8, 2021$47.6M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR C-32/C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEETSDepartment of DefenseJul 1, 2022$32.6M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR C-32 C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEETDepartment of DefenseJul 1, 2022$29.6M
AWARD CONTRACT FOR CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) FOR SUPPORT OF THE AH64 APACHE HELICOPTER.Department of DefenseJul 1, 2015$28.0M
COMBAT AIR FORCE GLOBAL STRIKE MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS- SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND MODERNIZATION.Department of DefenseSep 19, 2024$24.7M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR THE C-32/C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEET.Department of DefenseJul 1, 2020$17.1M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR C-32/C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEETS.Department of DefenseJul 1, 2021$14.4M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR THE C-32/C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEETDepartment of DefenseApr 27, 2020$9.4M
CONTRACTOR ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES (CETS) CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICES (CFS)Department of DefenseJan 1, 2024$8.9M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR THE C-32 C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEET.Department of DefenseJul 1, 2022$8.2M
CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) SUPPORT - USA REGIONALDepartment of DefenseJan 16, 2024$5.4M
BOEING ATCOM SUPPORT SERVICES, FORT RUCKER, ALABAMADepartment of DefenseSep 19, 2013$4.4M
CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR C-32/C-40 AIRCRAFT FLEETS.Department of DefenseJul 1, 2022$4.4M
ATCOM SUPPORT SERVICESDepartment of DefenseSep 28, 2021$4.2M
CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) AIRFRAME SUPPORT FOR APACHEDepartment of DefenseJan 1, 2023$4.0M
CFSR SUPPORT FOR APACHE HELICOPTERSDepartment of DefenseDec 7, 2023$3.8M
CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE - REGIONALDepartment of DefenseSep 15, 2020$3.3M
CFSR SUPPORT FOR APACHEDepartment of DefenseDec 17, 2021$3.3M
PROVIDE TESTING IN THE BOEING LCAT ARC-JET FACILITY IN SUPPORT OF NASA HYPERSONIC MATERIAL DEVELOPMENTNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationApr 5, 2021$3.1M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. has received $40,313,104 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. is ranked #1848 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.