Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Brice Engineering, LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #1936

Total Federal Spending
$38.2M
$38,185,196
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
2
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
PFAS SOIL WASHING TREATMENTDepartment of DefenseNov 10, 2022$31.4M
IRP NORTH PLAYA PFAS RESPONSE ACTION, CAFB. AWARDING ONLY BASE CLINS AT AWARD.Department of DefenseSep 26, 2023$31.0M
CONTAMINATED SOIL REMOVALDepartment of DefenseAug 5, 2022$12.1M
SOLID WASTE TRANSPORT AND DISPOSAL AT WAKE ISLANDDepartment of DefenseSep 22, 2022$7.9M
AE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR RCRA LONG TERM MANAGEMENT (LTM), PERMIT AND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES (FUDS) BASE CLEANUP MANAGEMENT (KODIAK, AK) PN 16197691Department of Homeland SecurityJul 7, 2022$7.6M
CONDUCT PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION OF PER- AND PFAS AT CLEAR SPACE FORCE STATION, ALASKA AND WAKE ISLAND AIR FIELD, WAKE ATOLL AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION AT SITE ZZ011. PROJECT NUMBERS: DXEB20227327PF, YGFZ20227327PF AND YGFZ20227333Department of DefenseJul 22, 2022$6.6M
EAR056B DLA SERVICE STATION REPAIRS, EARECKSON AIR STATION, ALASKADepartment of DefenseSep 24, 2024$6.4M
HAZARDOUS, TOXIC, AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) REMEDIAL ACTION (RA) FORT BABCOCK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITE (FUDS) (F10AK0353-04)KRUZOF ISLAND, AK.Department of DefenseJul 27, 2022$6.0M
PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION OF PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS)Department of DefenseSep 18, 2024$5.8M
GROUNDWATER MONITORINGDepartment of DefenseMay 1, 2023$5.0M
EAS WASTE HEAT LOOP PHASE 3 REPAIRDepartment of DefenseAug 17, 2022$4.8M
SOLID WASTE TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL EAS EARECKSON AIR STATIONDepartment of DefenseSep 27, 2023$4.8M
611 ORC NORTH AFC075Department of DefenseSep 23, 2020$4.1M
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION MP4, MP5 COLD BAY.Department of DefenseSep 16, 2024$3.1M
REMEDIATION SERVICESDepartment of DefenseApr 1, 2023$2.6M
O&M S,A,R (TEAD-N)Department of DefenseJan 1, 2024$2.5M
PN 12073905 KODIAK RCRA LTM & REPORTSDepartment of Homeland SecurityFeb 3, 2020$2.4M
NIKE SITE BAY RI ERP078Department of DefenseSep 23, 2020$2.3M
FWA NOURI - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIONS AT VARIOUS SITES FORT WAINWRIGHT, ALASKADepartment of DefenseSep 27, 2021$2.0M
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SUPPORT FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE IN-RIVER PORTION OF THE BRADFORD ISLAND CLEANUP SITE AT CASCADE LOCKS, OREGON.Department of DefenseAug 8, 2022$1.7M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Brice Engineering, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Brice Engineering, LLC has received $38,185,196 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Brice Engineering, LLC works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Brice Engineering, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Brice Engineering, LLC is ranked #1936 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.