Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #446
Watch Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. for new federal awards
We'll email you the moment Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. changes. No spam — only real updates.
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| P200 NPTU SIMULATOR TRAINING FACILITY | Department of Defense | Feb 5, 2024 | $21.9M |
| NPTU CHARLESTON SC | Department of Defense | Jul 12, 2012 | $20.4M |
| A-E SERVICES DESIGN NEXT GEN LCAAP EWI FULL DESIGN | Department of Defense | Jan 26, 2024 | $17.7M |
| COMPONENT REMANUFACTURING FACILITY, ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT, AL | Department of Defense | Dec 7, 2023 | $15.2M |
| MSIC ADVANCED ANALYSIS FACILITY DESIGN REDSTONE ARSENAL, HUNTSVILLE AL. | Department of Defense | Aug 6, 2021 | $14.9M |
| TASK ORDER: THE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (A-E) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION OF A FULL DESIGN SOLICITATION FOR THE MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY (MDA) VON BRAUN IV (VB IV) CONSOLIDATED TEST CENTER (CTC) PROJECT ON REDSTONE ARSENAL, AL. | Department of Defense | May 18, 2022 | $12.8M |
| DESIGN BID BUILD-KC-46A ADAL HANGARS 1, 4, AND 5, MACDILL AFB, FL | Department of Defense | Jul 18, 2022 | $11.1M |
| DESIGN OF THE B-21: PHASE HANGAR AT ELLSWORTH AFB, SD | Department of Defense | Aug 31, 2021 | $11.1M |
| TASKS 1 THROUGH 3 | Department of Defense | Jun 9, 2022 | $10.5M |
| A-E SERVICES DESIGN NEXT GEN | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2023 | $9.2M |
| AE SERVICES TO DESIGN B21 LOW OBSERVABLE CORROSION FACILITY | Department of Defense | Sep 6, 2023 | $9.1M |
| X023 USMC HURRICANE FLORENCE PACKAGE 7 | Department of Defense | Jul 19, 2019 | $9.1M |
| IGF::OT::IGF 19E-15% CONCEPT DESIGN SERVICES, NSG KINGS BAY, GEORGIA | Department of Defense | Jan 14, 2019 | $8.6M |
| TASK ORDER AWARD FOR DESIGN SECURE FACILITY, JBLM. | Department of Defense | Oct 19, 2023 | $8.5M |
| ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF THE JOINT OPERATIONS&MISSION PLANNING CENTER (JOMPC)AT SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, IL. THE BASE IS BEING AWARDED AT THIS TIME IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,048,908.00 | Department of Defense | Apr 17, 2019 | $8.0M |
| PDA DESIGN FOR P239 | Department of Defense | Dec 27, 2019 | $7.9M |
| ADVANCE BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ABMS), FAMILY OF SYSTEMS (FOS) MAINTENANCE AND LOGISTICS FACILITY, PN#UHHZ494740, ROBINS AFB, GA | Department of Defense | Jun 16, 2021 | $7.8M |
| PROJECT TITLE AND LOCATION: GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT (GBSD) RE-ENTRY VEHICLE FACILITY, VANDENBERG SPACE FORCE BASE (SFB), CA | Department of Defense | Aug 16, 2023 | $7.5M |
| REPAIR/ RENOVATION TO COMPLETE DESIGN-BID-BUILD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCORPORATING CRITERIA FROM THE FIVE (5) PROGRAMMED REPAIR PROJECTS FOR BUILDING 110 INTO A SINGLE EXECUTED DESIGN TASK ORDER AT ROBINS AFB, GA. | Department of Defense | May 7, 2024 | $7.4M |
| BRING TO 100% FULL DESIGN B21 RF HANGAR FACILITY | Department of Defense | Jun 22, 2023 | $7.3M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. has received $175,703,342 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Burns & Mcdonnell Engineering Company, Inc. is ranked #446 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.