Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Caci Technologies, LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #226

Total Federal Spending
$371.8M
$371,785,427
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD A NEW FIVE (5) YEAR TASK ORDER UNDER THE RS3 CONTRACT FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION, ANALYSIS, ENGINEERING, NETWORKING, AND EXPERIMENTATION SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseApr 13, 2020$202.0M
IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL FORCES LOGISTICS SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseNov 30, 2016$178.8M
IGF::OT::IGFDepartment of DefenseJul 1, 2017$166.4M
REPLICATION, EXPLOITATION, AND ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL THREATS PROGRAM (REACT) RS3-21-0034Department of DefenseJan 17, 2024$144.2M
RESPONSIVE STRATEGIC SOURCES FOR SERVICES (RS3) CONTRACT W15P7T-19-D-0157 AWARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH (IAW) THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) ENTITLED, ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR C5ISR FLIGHT ACTIVITY (CFA) DIVISION.Department of DefenseSep 29, 2021$131.9M
IWS CONSOLIDATED UNRESTRICTED - ACQUISITION SUPPORT&ILSDepartment of DefenseSep 4, 2018$122.1M
IGF::CL,CT::IGF THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE FIELD SERVICE, ENGINEERING,, AND MODELING&SIMULATION OF SENSORS APPLICATIONS SUPPORT FOR FORCE PROTECTION.Department of DefenseJan 30, 2015$115.2M
THIS ORDER IS FOR A FIVE (5) YEAR (12 MONTH BASE AND FOUR (4) 12 MONTH OPTIONS) CPFF, COST NO FEE CYBER SECURITY&INFORMATION ASSURANCE (CSIA) DIVISION SUPPORT SERVICES.Department of DefenseAug 22, 2018$109.5M
SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL, AND ANALYTICAL (SETA) SUPPORT FOR: NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA), NAVAL SHIPYARD AND NAVAL INDUSTRIAL BASE EFFORTS RELATED TO WORKFORCE, WORKLOAD, INTEGRATED PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPMENT (IPTD), LOGISTIC SERVICES, PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES, BUSINESS OPERATIONS, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH, AND TOTAL FORCE SHIP MAINTENANCE EXECUTION INITIATIVES IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT EXECUTION AND DECK PLATE EFFECTIVENESS.Department of DefenseJul 20, 2018$107.3M
BASE AWARD FOR SUPPORT OF PROJECT MANAGER INTEGRATED VISUAL AUGMENTATION SYSTEM (PM-IVAS)Department of DefenseApr 21, 2023$105.2M
NEW EQUIPMENT FIELDING AND TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICESDepartment of DefenseJul 1, 2020$102.3M
THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD A BASE YEAR, WITH 3 OPTION YEARS TASK ORDER CYBER AND GROUND ELECTRONIC WARGARE SUPPORT (CAGES).Department of DefenseJun 2, 2020$79.1M
TASK ORDER KY16 IS A HYBRID COST NO FEE AND COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE - TERM CONTRACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RAPID RESPONSE THIRD GENERATION (R2-3G) CONTRACT W15P7T-10-D-D413. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) ENTITLED, "MULTI-CAPABLE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION SUPPORT FOR SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE/QUICK REACTION TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF THE THE U.S ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND (RDECOM), COMMUNICATIONS- ELECTRONICS RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING CENTER (CERDEC), INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION WARFARE DIRECTORATES (I2WD) SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE/QUICK REACTION CAPABILITY (S/QRC) DIVISION. THE PWS HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO SECTION C OF THIS TASK ORDER. 3. THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (POP) FOR THE BASE PERIOD IS ONE 12-MONTH BASE PERIOD WITH TWO 12-MONTH OPTION PERIODS. SHOULD THE OPTION PERIOD BE EXERCISED, THE TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE FOR THIS CONTRACT WILL BE 36 MONTHS.Department of DefenseOct 26, 2017$75.8M
IGF::OT::IGF: ELECTRONIC WARFARE COMMUNICATION COMMAND PROTOTYPINGDepartment of DefenseSep 28, 2015$71.2M
IGF::OT::IGF "PROTOTYPING, MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, FIELDING, TRAINING AND LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR THE FABRICATION, INTEGRATION AND FIELDING FACILITY (FIFF) REQUIREMENTS"Department of DefenseSep 30, 2015$69.6M
THIS TASK ORDER UNDER SSES NEXGEN MULTIPLE AWARD INDEFINITE QUANTITY, IDIQ CONTRACT TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR ARATDepartment of DefenseJul 22, 2019$69.0M
IGF::CL,CT::IGF ARMY REPROGRAMMING ANALYSIS TEAM - PROGRAM OFFICE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseJan 29, 2015$65.6M
IGF::OT::IGF NEW TASK ORDER KY14 IS A COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE - TERM (CPFF - TERM) EFFORTBE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) ENTITLED, "DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND PROTECTION SERVICES (DEPS)" TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER (CERDEC) THE INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION WARFARE DIRECTORATE (I2WD). THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (POP) FOR THE BASE PERIOD IS ONE (1) TWELVE (12) MONTH BASE PERIOD WITH TWO (2) TWELVE (12) MONTH OPTION PERIODS. THE TOTAL NEGOTIATED CONTRACT VALUE IS $61,909,761.46Department of DefenseMar 8, 2016$64.3M
IGF::OT::IGF THIS IS A COST-PLUS-FIXED-FEE - TERM (CPFF - TERM) AWARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RAPID RESPONSE THIRD GENERATION (R23G) TO SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER (CERDEC), INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION WARFARE DIRECTORATE (I2WD) CERDEC FLIGHT ACTIVITY (CFA) ENGINEERING SUPPORT CONTRACT.Department of DefenseSep 28, 2017$64.1M
IGF::OT::IGF UNDEFINITIZED UCADepartment of DefenseJan 8, 2017$63.9M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Caci Technologies, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Caci Technologies, LLC has received $371,785,427 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Caci Technologies, LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Caci Technologies, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Caci Technologies, LLC is ranked #226 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.