Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Creare LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #1829

Total Federal Spending
$40.7M
$40,688,220
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
2
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/ENGINEERING AND HPH ASSETSDepartment of DefenseMar 15, 2024$14.9M
FRP TIME CRITICAL ITEMS & PROGRAM MGTDepartment of DefenseJun 21, 2023$14.4M
IGF::OT::IGF PHASE III SBIR CONTRACT FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF A 20 WATT 20 KELVIN CRYOCOOLER FOR THERMAL CONTROL OF SPACE-BASED LIQUID HYDROGEN. THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF WORK DEVELOPED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNDER PREVIOUS SBIR PHASE II CONTRACTS.National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDec 1, 2014$9.0M
WIDE RANGE PUMPNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDec 14, 2021$7.7M
LRIP TIME CRITICAL ITEMS & PROGRAM MGTDepartment of DefenseMar 14, 2022$7.0M
SBIR PH II DC-DC CONVERTOR PROTOTYPEDepartment of DefenseOct 2, 2019$4.3M
WILL DESIGN, BUILD, AND TEST A RECUPERATOR AND TURBOALTERNATOR SIZED FOR A 150 W, 90 K CRYOCOOLER. THESE COMPONENTS WILL BE DESIGNED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS IN SOW SECTION 3 AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TASK ELEMENTS IN SOW SECTION 4. THE MAPPING BETWEEN THE SOW SECTIONS AND OUR PROPOSAL IS GIVEN IN TABLE 1.National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAug 4, 2019$3.0M
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) SBIR PHASE IIIDepartment of DefenseJun 17, 2020$2.9M
SBIR PHASE II.5Department of DefenseJan 10, 2020$2.7M
STTR PHASE II R&D; MULTI-PHYSICS ANALYSIS TOOL FOR HIGH-ENERGY GAS LASERSDepartment of DefenseSep 28, 2018$2.6M
PHASE II AWARDDepartment of DefenseAug 22, 2024$2.0M
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDepartment of DefenseNov 18, 2021$2.0M
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDepartment of DefenseNov 12, 2019$1.8M
SBIR PHASE III - IGF::OT::IGFDepartment of DefenseSep 30, 2016$1.8M
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDepartment of DefenseJan 26, 2023$1.7M
GENERATING 3D MODELS OF UNKNOWN SPACE SYSTEMS TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOP SOFTWARE THAT PROVIDES END-TO-END 3-D PARAMETERIZATION OF SPACE SYSTEMS FROM ON-ORBIT IMAGERY.Department of DefenseAug 14, 2024$1.7M
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDepartment of DefenseSep 21, 2023$1.7M
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDepartment of DefenseApr 9, 2024$1.6M
PORTABLE HANDHELD IMAGING RADAR SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY EVALUATIONDepartment of DefenseJul 15, 2019$1.5M
SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH (SBIR II)- DEVELOPMENT OF A SMART REBOA CATHETER.Department of DefenseJun 6, 2022$1.5M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Creare LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Creare LLC has received $40,688,220 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Creare LLC works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Creare LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Creare LLC is ranked #1829 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.