Crider, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #1137
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010001/4400002085/4100029728/CHICKEN BONED POUCH-36/10 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Apr 10, 2024 | $16.5M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010282/4100030890/CHICKEN BONED CAN-24/12.5 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Aug 29, 2024 | $11.2M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000009519/4100028256/PORK CAN-24/24 OZ,BEEF CAN-24/24 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Aug 11, 2023 | $7.2M |
| 2000007957/4100023747/PORK CAN-24/24 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Aug 5, 2021 | $5.2M |
| 2000007719/4100023391/CHICKEN DICED CTN-40 LB | Department of Agriculture | May 27, 2021 | $5.1M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010243/4100030669/CHICKEN BONED CAN-24/12.5 OZ,CHICKEN BONED POUCH-36/10 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Aug 8, 2024 | $5.0M |
| 123J1417S0400 | Department of Agriculture | Aug 30, 2017 | $4.6M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010103/4100030208/BEEF CAN-24/24 OZ | Department of Agriculture | May 30, 2024 | $4.2M |
| 2000007630/4100022770/PORK CAN-24/24 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Mar 15, 2021 | $3.8M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010085/4100030190/CHICKEN BONED CAN-24/12.5 OZ | Department of Agriculture | May 29, 2024 | $3.7M |
| 2000005242/4100014594/CHICKEN BONED CAN-24/15 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Mar 15, 2018 | $3.6M |
| 2000005113/4100014220/CHICKEN BONED CAN-24/15 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Dec 15, 2017 | $3.5M |
| 123J1418S0065/CHICKEN DICED CTN-40 LB | Department of Agriculture | Nov 1, 2017 | $3.5M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000008223/4100024738/PORK CAN-24/24 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Feb 14, 2022 | $3.5M |
| 2000005335/4100014963/CHICKEN STRIPS FRZ CTN-30 LB | Department of Agriculture | May 16, 2018 | $3.4M |
| 2000006205/4100017679/CHICKEN DICED CTN-40 LB | Department of Agriculture | Jun 18, 2019 | $2.9M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000009740/4100028941/CHICKEN BONED CAN-24/12.5 OZ | Department of Agriculture | Dec 21, 2023 | $2.9M |
| 123J1418S0093/CHICKEN DICED CTN-40 LB | Department of Agriculture | Dec 4, 2017 | $2.8M |
| COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010234/4400002246/4100030467/CHICKEN DICED CTN-40 LB | Department of Agriculture | Jul 22, 2024 | $2.8M |
| 2000007643/4100022865/CHICKEN STRIPS FRZ CTN-30 LB | Department of Agriculture | Mar 30, 2021 | $2.7M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Crider, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Crider, Inc. has received $68,363,600 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Crider, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Agriculture. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Crider, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Crider, Inc. is ranked #1137 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.