Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Dawson Mcg, LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #1733

Total Federal Spending
$43.2M
$43,187,721
Total Obligations
24
Total Awards
24
Contracts
4
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
LAHAINA EMERGENCY SEWER SYSTEM PROJECT, FLEMING ROAD AND MALO STREET, LAHAINA, MAUI, HAWAIIDepartment of DefenseJul 10, 2024$25.4M
REAL PROPERTY SERVDepartment of DefenseSep 12, 2023$7.9M
CLIN 0001 VOLTAGE REGULATOR SYSTEMDepartment of DefenseJul 2, 2024$6.0M
REPAIR UNDERGROUND PRIMARY PHASE 1Department of DefenseSep 13, 2024$3.3M
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESDepartment of Homeland SecuritySep 30, 2024$3.0M
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF FORT CAVAZOSDepartment of the InteriorJun 1, 2024$2.2M
STORM & SANITARY PIPING UPGRADE AT THE MINTON CAPEHART FB 575 PENNSYLVANIA ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN. DAWSON PROPOSAL FOR $1,795,865.08 TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.General Services AdministrationJul 17, 2024$1.9M
REPLACEMENT OF FIRE ALARM SUPPRESSION SYSTEM IN ATTIC (B62), NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES, ILDepartment of DefenseAug 16, 2024$1.3M
RKMF230058 CONSTRUCT ALLIED SUPPORT, 31 CTS VTTC MODULAR FACSDepartment of DefenseSep 26, 2024$1.2M
FUNDING FOR P00002 EXTENSION OF SERVICES FOR 3 ADDITIONAL MONTHSDepartment of DefenseJan 1, 2024$781K
B.833/834 ELECTRICAL RECONFIGURATIONDepartment of DefenseDec 7, 2023$598K
FUNDING TASK ORDER FOR 2 MONTH EXTENSIONDepartment of DefenseApr 1, 2024$521K
CANNON AFB INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTDepartment of DefenseSep 20, 2024$350K
B5501 REMOVE TWO (2) FUME HOODS AND INSTALL NEW EQUIPMENT ON BOARD NAVY DRUG SCREENING LABORATORY - GREAT LAKES.Department of DefenseAug 15, 2024$273K
SITE INSPECTION AT THE NETC/MELVILLE INDUSTRIAL FACILITY IN PORTSMOUTH, RHODE ISLANDDepartment of DefenseSep 16, 2024$272K
HEAT DETECTOR REPLACEMENT FOR RED HILLDepartment of DefenseSep 23, 2024$253K
BUILDING 1301 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW PARTITION WALLS ON BOARD NAVSTA GREAT LAKES.Department of DefenseJun 28, 2024$221K
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MAINTENANCEDepartment of DefenseSep 17, 2024$93K
INWS EVALUATIONDepartment of DefenseJul 24, 2024$88K
KIRTLAND AFB OT-10 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTDepartment of DefenseAug 20, 2024$73K

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Dawson Mcg, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Dawson Mcg, LLC has received $43,187,721 in total federal obligations across 24 awards and 24 contracts.

Dawson Mcg, LLC works with 4 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Interior. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Dawson Mcg, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Dawson Mcg, LLC is ranked #1733 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.