Deloitte Consulting Limited
Federal Contractor · Rank #2004
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES NECESSARY FOR THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE USAID TANZANIA CLIENT CENTERED HEALTH PROGRAM HIV AND TUBERCULOSIS | Agency for International Development | Nov 9, 2021 | $103.6M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Deloitte Consulting Limited Federal Contracts FAQ
Deloitte Consulting Limited has received $36,537,743 in total federal obligations across 1 awards and 1 contracts.
Deloitte Consulting Limited works with 1 federal agencies, including Agency for International Development. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Deloitte Consulting Limited has received federal awards in multiple states.
Deloitte Consulting Limited is ranked #2004 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.