Dynetics, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #568
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| TASK ORDER FOR HIGH ENERGY LASER TACTICAL VEHICLE DEMONSTRATOR - THE USASMDC/ARSTRAT IS THE HEL DEVELOPER FOR THE ARMY AND THIS REQUIREMENT WILL SERVE AS AN ENABLER FOR A POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION TO THE PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE MISSILES AND SPACE FOR THE INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2-INTERCEPT PROGRAM OF RECORD. IGF::OT::IGF | Department of Defense | Aug 14, 2017 | $202.7M |
| RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TO THE WDI DIRECTORATE IGF::OT::IGF | General Services Administration | Sep 6, 2017 | $161.7M |
| TEST&EVALUATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR RANGES, ARMAMENTS AND SPECTRUM (TETRAS) MID-PRESSURE ARC HEATER (MPAH) POWER SUPPLY | Department of Defense | Dec 31, 2019 | $112.0M |
| SMALL GLIDE MINITIONS IDIQ | Department of Defense | Apr 8, 2021 | $69.5M |
| DELIVERY ORDER UNDER THE EGLIN WIDE AGILE ACQUISITION CONTRACT (EWAAC) INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) TO PERFORM THE TASKS NECESSARY TO PRODUCE ALL REQUIRED AURS, TM KITS, AND WDL KITS. | Department of Defense | Jul 3, 2024 | $52.7M |
| NEW CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE GREMLINS PROGRAM, PHASE III. | Department of Defense | Apr 17, 2018 | $52.4M |
| GUIDED WEAPONS EVALUATION FACILITY RADIO FREQUENCY MODERNIZATION | Department of Defense | Jan 31, 2020 | $48.0M |
| SMALL GLIDE MUNITION (SGM) - AUR | Department of Defense | Dec 7, 2018 | $47.8M |
| LETTER CONTRACT FOR LASER AIR MONITORING SYSTEM | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Feb 4, 2021 | $46.1M |
| BASIC | Department of Defense | Feb 12, 2010 | $38.0M |
| AIRBORNE THREAT SIMULATION ORGANIZATION | Department of Defense | Jun 27, 2018 | $33.0M |
| SMALL GLIDE MUNITIONS | Department of Defense | Dec 7, 2018 | $24.8M |
| INTENT OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE ALL SUSTAINMENT NEEDED FOR THE MIGS, EMC2, EBUCS, VTE AND THE DOTD CLASSROOM BECAUSE THE USASMDC/ARSTRAT DOES NOT HAVE ORGANIC CAPABILITY TO EXECUTE SYSTEM WIDE MAINTENANCE ABOVE THE DASH 10 (USER LEVEL MAINTENANCE). IF ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENTS ARE MADE THAT SIMPLY REPLACE OR INCREASE FUNCTIONALITY OF EXISTING SYSTEMS, CONTRACTOR WILL BE NOTIFIED OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES AND INCORPORATE THOSE INTO BASELINE SUPPORT, BUT NO CHANGES TO PWS ARE EXPECTED. | Department of Defense | Feb 1, 2018 | $23.3M |
| SMALL GLIDE MUNITION UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT ACTION | Department of Defense | Aug 24, 2017 | $23.3M |
| IGF::OT::IGF CENTER FOR COUNTERMEASURES SUPPORT | General Services Administration | Sep 26, 2018 | $19.6M |
| GPS-BRIE CORE | Department of Defense | Sep 6, 2017 | $17.2M |
| TEST&EVALUATION TECHNOLOGY FOR RANGES, ARMAMENTS, AND SPECTRUM (TETRAS) - RTS CCMS | Department of Defense | Sep 1, 2020 | $17.1M |
| THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROVIDE PCBS, FOR INTEGRATION INTO THE HITL. | Department of Defense | Aug 27, 2024 | $12.3M |
| GPS BRIE PAX | Department of Defense | Sep 6, 2017 | $12.0M |
| AIR COMBAT EVOLUTION (ACE)CONTRACT | Department of Defense | Mar 26, 2020 | $11.9M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Dynetics, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Dynetics, Inc. has received $137,053,855 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Dynetics, Inc. works with 3 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, General Services Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Dynetics, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Dynetics, Inc. is ranked #568 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.