E Corp.
Federal Contractor · Rank #1582
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY19 ENGINEERING SERVICES | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2018 | $7.9B |
| TRICARE MANAGED CARE SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT, 5TH GENERATION WEST REGION | Department of Defense | Jan 1, 2024 | $5.5B |
| IGF::CL::IGF AEROSPACE FFRDC CONTRACT FROM 1 OCT 2013 TO 30 SEPT 2018 | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2013 | $4.3B |
| DETAIL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FFG(X) GUIDED MISSILE FRIGATE | Department of Defense | Apr 30, 2020 | $2.6B |
| CENTER FOR ADVANCED AVIATION DEVELOPMENT (CAASD) FFRDC MITRE | Department of Transportation | Jul 7, 2010 | $1.7B |
| EXPRESS REPORT: APRIL FY24 EXPRESS REPORT Q3 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Apr 1, 2024 | $857.2M |
| EXPRESS REPORT: MAY FY24 R4 EXPRESS REPORT Q3 | Department of Veterans Affairs | May 1, 2024 | $809.4M |
| EXPRESS REPORT FOR OCTOBER FY24 REGION 4 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Oct 1, 2023 | $786.0M |
| EXPRESS REPORT AUGUST 2024 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Aug 1, 2024 | $776.9M |
| EXPRESS REPORT: JULY FY24 R4 EXPRESS REPORT Q3 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Jul 1, 2024 | $766.4M |
| FY25 TASK ORDER 7 - TO PROVIDE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) AND OTHER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2024 | $753.9M |
| FY24 TASK ORDER 6 - INITIAL FUNDING AND UPDATING PWS & DD254 | Department of Defense | Sep 21, 2023 | $735.3M |
| EXPRESS REPORT: JUNE FY24 R4 EXPRESS REPORT | Department of Veterans Affairs | Jun 1, 2024 | $718.7M |
| EXPRESS REPORT: JANUARY FY24 R4 EXPRESS REPORT Q2 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Oct 1, 2023 | $716.6M |
| CAASD MUST PROVIDE ESSENTIAL ENGINEERING, RESEARCH, AND ANALYSIS CAPABILITIES TO SUPPORT THE FAA IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ITS MISSION THROUGH A SYSTEMS APPROACH THAT ADDRESSES ALL DIMENSIONS (E.G. POLITICAL, OPERATIONAL, ECONOMIC, TECHNICAL) REQUIRED TO | Department of Transportation | Oct 20, 2021 | $700.5M |
| EXPRESS REPORT: DECEMBER EXPRESS REPORT Q1 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Dec 1, 2023 | $696.0M |
| INITIAL MODIFICATION ON TASK ORDER 5 NSEC, FFRDC TO INCREMENTALLY FUND, UPDATE PWS & DD254 | Department of Defense | Sep 29, 2022 | $687.3M |
| EXPRESS REPORT: MARCH FY24 EXPRESS REPORT Q2 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Mar 1, 2024 | $655.3M |
| EXPRESS REPORT FOR NOVEMBER FY24 Q1 | Department of Veterans Affairs | Nov 1, 2023 | $640.4M |
| TASK ORDER 4 FOR NSEC FFRDC, INITIAL FUNDING. | Department of Defense | Sep 23, 2021 | $617.9M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
E Corp. Federal Contracts FAQ
E Corp. has received $47,667,982 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
E Corp. works with 3 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Transportation. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
E Corp. has received federal awards in multiple states.
E Corp. is ranked #1582 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.