Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Edesia, Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #935

Total Federal Spending
$81.3M
$81,327,962
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
PURCHASE OF 1,000 MT RUSF FOR WFP PROGRAMS FROM BPA CALL 015Agency for International DevelopmentSep 29, 2023$3.4M
PROCUREMENT OF 1,018 MT OF RUSF FOR WFP PROGRAMS FROM CALL 25Agency for International DevelopmentSep 30, 2024$3.0M
PROCUREMENT OF 986 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF PROGRAMS FROM CALL 25Agency for International DevelopmentSep 30, 2024$3.0M
PROCUREMENT OF 986 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF PROGRAMS FROM CALL 25Agency for International DevelopmentSep 30, 2024$3.0M
PROCUREMENT OF 986 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF PROGRAMS FROM CALL 25Agency for International DevelopmentSep 30, 2024$3.0M
PURCHASE OF 1,010 MT RUTF FOR UNICEF YEMEN FROM BPA CALL 017Agency for International DevelopmentMar 18, 2024$3.0M
PROCUREMENT OF 1000 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF SOUTH SUDAN FROM CALL 23Agency for International DevelopmentSep 12, 2024$3.0M
PROCUREMENT OF 1010 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF NIGERIA FROM CALL 22Agency for International DevelopmentAug 13, 2024$3.0M
PROCUREMENT OF 1000 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF SUDAN FROM CALL 22Agency for International DevelopmentAug 13, 2024$2.9M
PURCHASE OF 992 MT RUTF FOR UNICEF PAKISTAN AND YEMEN FROM BPA CALL 017Agency for International DevelopmentMar 18, 2024$2.9M
PURCHASE OF 980 MT RTSF FOR UNICEF SUDAN FROM BPA CALL 016Agency for International DevelopmentJan 26, 2024$2.9M
PROCUREMENT OF 984 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF PROGRAMS FROM CALL 24Agency for International DevelopmentSep 25, 2024$2.9M
PROCUREMENT OF 1000 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF NIGERIA FROM CALL 21Agency for International DevelopmentJul 24, 2024$2.9M
PROCUREMENT OF 982 MT OF RUSF FOR WFP PROGRAMS FROM CALL 25Agency for International DevelopmentSep 30, 2024$2.9M
PROCUREMENT OF 974 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF DRC AND HAITI FROM CALL 24Agency for International DevelopmentSep 25, 2024$2.9M
PROCUREMENT OF 951 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF SUDAN FROM CALL 23Agency for International DevelopmentSep 12, 2024$2.8M
PROCUREMENT OF 399 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF NIGERIA AND 500 MT OF LNS-MQ FOR MADAGASCAR AND CHAD FROM CALL 22Agency for International DevelopmentAug 13, 2024$2.8M
PROCUREMENT OF 938 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF HAITI AND KENYA FROM CALL 24Agency for International DevelopmentSep 25, 2024$2.8M
PROCUREMENT OF 940 MT OF RUTF FOR UNICEF AND ACF PROGRAMS FROM CALL 20Agency for International DevelopmentMay 17, 2024$2.7M
PROCUREMENT OF 940 MT OF RUTF AND RUSF FOR UNICEF AND WFP PROGRAMS FROM CALL 24Agency for International DevelopmentSep 25, 2024$2.7M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Edesia, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Edesia, Inc. has received $81,327,962 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Edesia, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Agency for International Development. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Edesia, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Edesia, Inc. is ranked #935 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.