Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Engineering Services Network Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #1895

Total Federal Spending
$39.0M
$38,969,738
Total Obligations
11
Total Awards
11
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
IGF::OT::IGF AIR DOMINANCE ENGINEERING AND LOGISTICS SERVICESDepartment of DefenseMay 8, 2018$59.4M
NAVAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICESDepartment of DefenseSep 30, 2019$44.4M
IGF::OT::IGF COMBAT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL SEQUENCING SUPPORT SERVICES, UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF THE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, PORT HUENEME DIVISION, AIR DOMINANCE DEPARTMENT IN SUPPORT OF NSWC CORONA DIVISIONDepartment of DefenseSep 8, 2017$27.9M
THE MAINTENANCE FIGURE OF MERIT (MFOM) SYSTEM MISSION IS TO SUSTAIN, FIELD, AND PROVIDE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT TO THE PMW 150 MFOM PROGRAM OFFICE. THIS SUPPORT INCLUDES SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, STRATEGIC PLANNING AND SUSTAINMENT.Department of DefenseSep 27, 2018$26.5M
BUSINESS APPLICATIONS IN SERVICE ENGINEERING AGENT (BA ISEA) INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM (IPT) TECHNICAL SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseSep 29, 2022$26.5M
COMBAT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL SEQUENCING SYSTEM (CSOSS) AND COMBAT SYSTEM TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MANUAL (CSTOM) CONTRACT SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY OF UPDATE PACKAGES TO SHIPS AND SELECTED SHORE SITES.Department of DefenseSep 1, 2022$23.6M
ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICESDepartment of DefenseDec 16, 2021$19.8M
SBIR/STTR DON AND PMO SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseSep 30, 2022$16.6M
MAINTENANCE FIGURE OF MERIT (MFOM) TEST, OPERATIONS AND SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseJul 2, 2024$11.9M
LOGISTICS, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNICAL SERVICES TO SUPPORT NUWCDIVNPT FIELD ENGINEERING OFFICE DETACHMENT NORFOLK MINIATURE MICRO-MINIATURE (2M) REPAIR / MODULE TEST AND REPAIR (MTR) PROGRAM.Department of DefenseJan 27, 2022$4.9M
200512!063070!1700!N00178!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4045 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050224!20051231!933578825!933578825!933578825!N!ENGINEERING SERVICES NETWORK, !2450 CRYSTAL DR STE 1015 !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000000200000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !180 !DDG 51 !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!D!A! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1700!N00178!0001! !Department of DefenseFeb 24, 2005$3.2M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Engineering Services Network Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Engineering Services Network Inc. has received $38,969,738 in total federal obligations across 11 awards and 11 contracts.

Engineering Services Network Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Engineering Services Network Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Engineering Services Network Inc. is ranked #1895 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.