Federal Resources Corporation
Federal Contractor · Rank #1048
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| GATEWAY | Department of State | Jul 20, 2020 | $39.9M |
| RESEARCH PLATFORM SOFTWARE | Department of State | Mar 20, 2023 | $24.2M |
| MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEMS REV X SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2019 | $23.2M |
| DATA MODERNIZATION INITIATIVE, CLOUD PLATFORM, & RELATED SERVICES | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 20, 2023 | $17.5M |
| SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) AND HARDWARE IN DIRECT SUPPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT MODERNIZATION OF THEIR COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING PLATFORMS | Department of State | Feb 21, 2023 | $16.9M |
| MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEMS MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2019 | $6.4M |
| SERVICE NOW SERVICES | Department of State | Sep 29, 2020 | $6.2M |
| INSTABILITY MONITORING ANALYSIS PLATFORM (MAP) | Department of State | Sep 25, 2023 | $5.7M |
| SERVICE NOW SOFTWARE LICENSES | Department of State | Dec 13, 2021 | $5.7M |
| GPA VIDEO BROADCAST SUPPORT | Department of State | Apr 5, 2023 | $5.4M |
| ELASTIC CUSTOM FEDERAL SUBSCRIPTION BUNDLED LICENSES | Department of Defense | Jun 1, 2024 | $3.6M |
| THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Jun 18, 2009 | $3.4M |
| TRELLIX MCAFEE SKYHIGH | Department of Defense | Mar 29, 2024 | $3.4M |
| SERVICENOW FEDERALIZED MODULES | Department of State | Feb 15, 2022 | $3.3M |
| NEW TO FOR FIREEYE AND VERODIN SOFTWARE, POP CONSISTS OF A BASE YEAR AND TWO (2) ONE-YEAR OPTIONS. | General Services Administration | Mar 1, 2021 | $3.3M |
| 8508564645!ADP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2021 | $3.3M |
| TAC MARKETING REPLACING ECU. | Department of State | May 15, 2023 | $3.0M |
| PROCURE RECRUITMENT MARKETING SERVICES | Department of State | Aug 12, 2024 | $2.7M |
| FOLLOW-ON TASK ORDER FOR CONTINUE SKILLS INCENTIVE PROGRAM (SIP) APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT UNDER SERVICENOW. | Department of State | Jul 16, 2023 | $2.3M |
| HR & PAYROLL CASE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES | General Services Administration | Sep 27, 2024 | $2.0M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Federal Resources Corporation Federal Contracts FAQ
Federal Resources Corporation has received $73,250,304 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Federal Resources Corporation works with 5 federal agencies, including Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Federal Resources Corporation has received federal awards in multiple states.
Federal Resources Corporation is ranked #1048 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.