Fidelity Technologies Corporation
Federal Contractor · Rank #516
Watch Fidelity Technologies Corporation for new federal awards
We'll email you the moment Fidelity Technologies Corporation changes. No spam — only real updates.
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROCUREMENT OF HEMTTA4, PLSA, HEMTT TAM AND M915A LONG TERM ARMOR STRATEGY B-KITS | Department of Defense | Feb 22, 2013 | $133.6M |
| SURFACE AND LCS COMS | Department of Defense | Jun 28, 2019 | $104.5M |
| NASNI ROMEO | Department of Defense | Jul 1, 2022 | $38.9M |
| THIS ACTION IS A TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT N61340-11-D-1005. ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO CONTRACT N61340-11-D-1005 ARE APPLICABLE FOR THIS ORDER. CNATRA COMS - NAS WHITING FIELD FL, NAS PENSACOLA FL, NAS MERIDIAN MS, NAS KINGSVILLE TX,&NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX | Department of Defense | Apr 1, 2012 | $36.1M |
| IGF::OT::IGF SURFACE AND RTC GREAT LAKES, IL COMS | Department of Defense | Apr 30, 2014 | $32.5M |
| IGF::OT::IGF MOBILIZATION | Department of Defense | Feb 1, 2017 | $32.4M |
| IGF::OT::IGF CMS LABOR - SIX SITES | Department of Defense | Dec 1, 2016 | $22.9M |
| E-6B CONTRACTOR OPERATOR&MAINTENANCE SERVICE (COMS) AND CONTRACTOR INSTRUCTION SERVICES (CIS) | Department of Defense | Jan 1, 2020 | $21.2M |
| 3KW GENERATORS & PDUS | Department of Defense | Nov 18, 2021 | $540K |
| THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING ON THE 3KW. | Department of Defense | Aug 22, 2023 | $438K |
| 168 EA FAN ASSEMBLY, OPTION EXERCISED AT TIME OF AWARD | Department of Defense | May 16, 2018 | $292K |
| THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER W909MY24F0032 IS TO PROCURE 126 POWER DISTRIBUTION UNITS ON CLIN 0006. | Department of Defense | Aug 8, 2024 | $263K |
| THE PURPOSE OF THE DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FUEL LEVEL SENDER QUALIFICATION TESTING AND INCLUDE AN OPTION FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND FAILURE ANALYSIS. | Department of Defense | Jun 25, 2024 | $55K |
| PROCUREMENT OF SUPPRESSION J-BOX FOR USE OF MH-65 AIRCRAFT. | Department of Homeland Security | Aug 23, 2023 | $20K |
| PURCHASE ORDER OF SUPPRESSION, J-BOX'S TO BE USED ON USCG MH-60T HELICOPTERS. | Department of Homeland Security | Dec 27, 2023 | $16K |
| PROCUREMENT OF VARIOUS PARTS TO BE USED ON THE MH65 AIRCRAFT | Department of Homeland Security | Nov 20, 2020 | $12K |
| SEAPORT NXG MINIMUM OBLIGATION TASK ORDER | Department of Defense | Jan 2, 2019 | $500 |
| THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE QUALIFICATION OF THE NEWLY DESIGNED INVERTER/CONVERTER FOR THE 3KW GENERATOR SET UNDER ECP BOS-0001. | Department of Defense | Jun 29, 2022 | - |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Fidelity Technologies Corporation Federal Contracts FAQ
Fidelity Technologies Corporation has received $150,662,226 in total federal obligations across 18 awards and 18 contracts.
Fidelity Technologies Corporation works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Fidelity Technologies Corporation has received federal awards in multiple states.
Fidelity Technologies Corporation is ranked #516 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.