Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Fidelity Technologies Corporation

Federal Contractor · Rank #524

Total Federal Spending
$150.7M
$150,662,226
Total Obligations
17
Total Awards
17
Contracts
2
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
PROCUREMENT OF HEMTTA4, PLSA, HEMTT TAM AND M915A LONG TERM ARMOR STRATEGY B-KITSDepartment of DefenseFeb 22, 2013$133.6M
SURFACE AND LCS COMSDepartment of DefenseJun 28, 2019$104.5M
NASNI ROMEODepartment of DefenseJul 1, 2022$38.9M
THIS ACTION IS A TASK ORDER UNDER CONTRACT N61340-11-D-1005. ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO CONTRACT N61340-11-D-1005 ARE APPLICABLE FOR THIS ORDER. CNATRA COMS - NAS WHITING FIELD FL, NAS PENSACOLA FL, NAS MERIDIAN MS, NAS KINGSVILLE TX,&NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TXDepartment of DefenseApr 1, 2012$36.1M
IGF::OT::IGF SURFACE AND RTC GREAT LAKES, IL COMSDepartment of DefenseApr 30, 2014$32.5M
IGF::OT::IGF MOBILIZATIONDepartment of DefenseFeb 1, 2017$32.4M
IGF::OT::IGF CMS LABOR - SIX SITESDepartment of DefenseDec 1, 2016$22.9M
E-6B CONTRACTOR OPERATOR&MAINTENANCE SERVICE (COMS) AND CONTRACTOR INSTRUCTION SERVICES (CIS)Department of DefenseJan 1, 2020$21.2M
3KW GENERATORS & PDUSDepartment of DefenseNov 18, 2021$540K
THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION IS TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING ON THE 3KW.Department of DefenseAug 22, 2023$438K
168 EA FAN ASSEMBLY, OPTION EXERCISED AT TIME OF AWARDDepartment of DefenseMay 16, 2018$292K
THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER W909MY24F0032 IS TO PROCURE 126 POWER DISTRIBUTION UNITS ON CLIN 0006.Department of DefenseAug 8, 2024$263K
THE PURPOSE OF THE DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE THE FUEL LEVEL SENDER QUALIFICATION TESTING AND INCLUDE AN OPTION FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND FAILURE ANALYSIS.Department of DefenseJun 25, 2024$55K
PROCUREMENT OF SUPPRESSION J-BOX FOR USE OF MH-65 AIRCRAFT.Department of Homeland SecurityAug 23, 2023$20K
PURCHASE ORDER OF SUPPRESSION, J-BOX'S TO BE USED ON USCG MH-60T HELICOPTERS.Department of Homeland SecurityDec 27, 2023$16K
PROCUREMENT OF VARIOUS PARTS TO BE USED ON THE MH65 AIRCRAFTDepartment of Homeland SecurityNov 20, 2020$12K
THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE QUALIFICATION OF THE NEWLY DESIGNED INVERTER/CONVERTER FOR THE 3KW GENERATOR SET UNDER ECP BOS-0001.Department of DefenseJun 29, 2022-

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Fidelity Technologies Corporation Federal Contracts FAQ

Fidelity Technologies Corporation has received $150,662,226 in total federal obligations across 17 awards and 17 contracts.

Fidelity Technologies Corporation works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Fidelity Technologies Corporation has received federal awards in multiple states.

Fidelity Technologies Corporation is ranked #524 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.