Granite-obayashi 2, a Joint Venture
Federal Contractor · Rank #582
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONTRACT N6274223D1323 TASK ORDER N6274223F9922 P-309 GROUND COMBAT ELEMENT - INFANTRY BATTALIONS 1 & 2 | Department of Defense | Mar 14, 2023 | $129.2M |
| FY23, P325, 9TH ESB EQUIPMENT AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY, CONSTRUCT | Department of Defense | Sep 20, 2024 | $116.9M |
| WON 1691489, P-928, RGS-A, MCBCB | Department of Defense | Sep 20, 2024 | $22.8M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Granite-obayashi 2, a Joint Venture Federal Contracts FAQ
Granite-obayashi 2, a Joint Venture has received $135,281,934 in total federal obligations across 3 awards and 3 contracts.
Granite-obayashi 2, a Joint Venture works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Granite-obayashi 2, a Joint Venture has received federal awards in multiple states.
Granite-obayashi 2, a Joint Venture is ranked #582 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.