Hydrogeologic, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #448
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| RACS II REGION III CONTRACT | Environmental Protection Agency | Jul 1, 2007 | $59.5M |
| FY21 NORCO HGL | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2021 | $55.7M |
| REMEDIATION/DEMOLITION OF U.S. ARMY COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER (CCDC) AND U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL DEFENSE (MRICD) FACILITIES GROUP 2 FACILITIES ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND | Department of Defense | Jun 30, 2021 | $49.9M |
| IGF::OT::IGF APG REMEDIATION/DEMOLITION GROUP 1 | Department of Defense | Jul 6, 2018 | $37.3M |
| NTO REMEDIATION/DEMOLITION OF U.S. ARMY COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER AND US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL DEFENSE FACILITIES GROUP 3 FACILITIES, ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2023 | $37.3M |
| OPTIMIZED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES FOR AFCEC IN EAST FLORIDA AT CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, PATRICK SPACE FORCE BASE, AND HOMESTEAD AIR RESERVE BASE | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2021 | $33.3M |
| NEWTON COUNTY MINE WASTE SUPERFUND SITE | Department of Defense | Sep 26, 2019 | $32.3M |
| INTERIM MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION AT MSFC-003-R-01 REDSTONE ARSENAL, MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA | Department of Defense | Sep 3, 2020 | $31.2M |
| IGF::OT::IGF FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAMS (FUSRAP) | Department of Defense | Jul 8, 2016 | $28.5M |
| IGF::OT::IGF FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAMS (FUSRAP) | Department of Defense | Jul 8, 2016 | $25.4M |
| FY21 SLDS HGL | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2021 | $25.1M |
| THIS IS A REMEDIATION ACTION FRAMEWORK (RAF) REMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (RES) TASK ORDER (TO) TO PROVIDE REMEDIATION TO SOURCE MATERIAL AND PRINCIPAL THREAT WASTE IN OPERABLE UNIT 2 (OU2) CONTAMINATED SOILS AND SEDIMENTS AT THE BAGHURST DRIVE | Environmental Protection Agency | Sep 26, 2024 | $25.0M |
| RES CIDRA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE RA (RAMALLO SOILS / GW PLUME) | Environmental Protection Agency | Oct 1, 2023 | $23.3M |
| RES PESTICIDE WAREHOUSE III (OU1 & OU2) SUPERFUND SITE (SSID 02RP) REMEDIAL ACTION (RA) | Environmental Protection Agency | Oct 1, 2023 | $23.0M |
| FRONT RANGE OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT | Department of Defense | Jul 15, 2020 | $22.5M |
| RES CREESE AND COOK TANNERY RA001 AND RA002. CONTRACT: 68HERH19D0010 | Environmental Protection Agency | Sep 19, 2024 | $22.0M |
| RD WAIKOLOA | Department of Defense | Aug 31, 2020 | $21.8M |
| BPMD, WASTE REPOSITORY, SAN JUAN COUNTY, CO. | Department of Defense | Jan 31, 2024 | $21.8M |
| USARPAC GUAM NTO | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2024 | $15.8M |
| REMEDIAL ACTION EFFORTS AT THE MAYWOOD FUSRAP SF SITE | Department of Defense | May 25, 2023 | $15.5M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Hydrogeologic, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Hydrogeologic, Inc. has received $178,205,458 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Hydrogeologic, Inc. works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Hydrogeologic, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Hydrogeologic, Inc. is ranked #448 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.