Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Inter-con Security Systems, Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #435

Total Federal Spending
$182.8M
$182,812,821
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
3
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
GUARD SERVICES FOR DOS PHYSICAL FACILITIES CONUS AND OCONUS.Department of StateNov 1, 2021$563.9M
THIS CONTRACT IS IN SUPPORT OF DS/DO/DFP IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: ALFRED MAASS- 202-647-3005Department of StateDec 15, 2018$358.9M
ORDER ID07190051, PIID ON FORM 300 IS 47QFWA19A0013General Services AdministrationSep 1, 2019$35.9M
GEORGETOWN LOCAL GUARD PROGRAM REFERENCE PR- PR10011239Department of StateJan 1, 2023$17.7M
LOCAL GUARD PROGRAM - US MISSION IN MEXICO CITYDepartment of StateJan 1, 2018$17.3M
NEW SECURITY GUARD TASK ORDER AT THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY.National Archives and Records AdministrationNov 1, 2019$10.2M
LOCAL GUARD PROGRAM - US MISSION TIJUANADepartment of StateJan 1, 2018$10.1M
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) REQUIRES CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LOCAL GUARD SERVICES AT THE U.S. MISSION MEXICO. THE MISSION REQUIRES A SECURE ENVIRONMENT TO CONDUCT ITS MISSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, MDepartment of StateNov 1, 2023$9.5M
LOCAL GUARD SERVICES ACCRA, GHANADepartment of StateJan 31, 2020$8.9M
LOCAL GUARD SERVICES FOR US EMBASSY TUNIS, TUNISIADepartment of StateNov 1, 2022$8.5M
LOCAL GUARD PROGRAM - US MISSION IN CUIDAD JUAREZDepartment of StateJan 1, 2018$7.7M
IGF::CL::IGF - LOCAL GUARD SERVICES - US MISSION MEXICODepartment of StateJan 1, 2015$7.6M
US MISSION COTONOU- LOCAL GUARD PROGRAMDepartment of StateMar 1, 2021$7.5M
LOCAL GUARD UNIFORMED AND ARMED SERVICES ON BEHALF OF THE US AMERICAN MISSION MONROVIA WHICH REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT LOSS OR INJURY TO U.S. PERSONNEL, DEPENDENTS, PROPERTY DESTRUCTION OF ASSETS TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS AND DETER PDepartment of StateJun 1, 2023$7.2M
AWARD OF LOCAL GUARD PROGRAM - LOME, TOGO IGF::CL::IGFDepartment of StateAug 1, 2014$7.0M
LOCAL GUARD SERVICES US MISSION GUATEMALA CITY, GUATEMALADepartment of StateFeb 1, 2021$6.9M
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) REQUIRES CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LOCAL GUARD SERVICES AT THE U.S. MISSION MEXICO. THE MISSION REQUIRES A SECURE ENVIRONMENT TO CONDUCT ITS MISSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, MDepartment of StateNov 1, 2023$6.9M
LOCAL GUARD PROGRAM - US MISSION MONTERREYDepartment of StateJan 1, 2018$6.4M
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) REQUIRES CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LOCAL GUARD SERVICES AT THE U.S. MISSION MEXICO. THE MISSION REQUIRES A SECURE ENVIRONMENT TO CONDUCT ITS MISSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, MDepartment of StateNov 1, 2023$6.2M
LOCAL GUARD FORCE SERVICES U.S. MISSION LOME TOGODepartment of StateAug 1, 2020$6.1M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Inter-con Security Systems, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Inter-con Security Systems, Inc. has received $182,812,821 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Inter-con Security Systems, Inc. works with 3 federal agencies, including Department of State, General Services Administration, National Archives and Records Administration. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Inter-con Security Systems, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Inter-con Security Systems, Inc. is ranked #435 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.