Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation
Federal Contractor · Rank #414
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR PROTOTYPE INTEGRATION FACILITY | Department of Defense | Oct 17, 2017 | $350.2M |
| PROFESSIONAL SERVICES | Department of Defense | Aug 26, 2010 | $272.1M |
| TECHNICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR THE CCDC, AVIATION AND MISSILE CENTER (AVMC), SOFTWARE, SIMULATION, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, AND INTEGRATION (S3I) DIRECTORATE. THIS TASK ORDER PROVIDES SUPPORT TO THE SOFTWARE MISSION ASSURANCE ASSOCIATE AREA. | Department of Defense | Jun 5, 2020 | $246.6M |
| BASE AWARD | Department of Defense | Dec 12, 2011 | $221.8M |
| BASE OPTION - TECHNICAL SERVICE | Department of Defense | Mar 6, 2013 | $212.4M |
| IGF::CT::IGF AMRDEC PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Sep 27, 2017 | $179.4M |
| SERVICES | Department of Defense | Apr 2, 2008 | $160.4M |
| SUPPORT FOR CMDS | Department of Defense | Nov 24, 2010 | $156.6M |
| TASK ORDER FOR CRUISE MISSILE SYSTEMS (CMDS) ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT. IGF::CT::IGF | Department of Defense | May 31, 2018 | $132.4M |
| IGF::CT::IGF | Department of Defense | Mar 7, 2014 | $120.9M |
| TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Jul 27, 2023 | $116.0M |
| IGF::CT::IGF NEW TASK ORDER AWARD | Department of Defense | Jun 6, 2016 | $98.8M |
| OASIS TASK ORDER- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TO THE COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND (DEVCOM) AVIATION AND MISSILE CENTER (AVMC) | Department of Defense | Sep 22, 2023 | $88.8M |
| NEW TASK ORDER | Department of Defense | Jun 9, 2008 | $78.9M |
| IGF::CT::IGF PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AMRDEC, ED | Department of Defense | Jul 6, 2016 | $77.8M |
| TECHNICAL SUPPORT IN PRODUCTION AND SUSTAINMENT ENGINEERING TASKS FOR AVIATION AND MISSILE SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Feb 17, 2023 | $65.7M |
| ADVANCED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT | Department of Defense | May 27, 2010 | $60.7M |
| ENGINEERING/SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Sep 10, 2008 | $58.8M |
| RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROTOTYPE INSTALL | Department of Defense | Mar 31, 2023 | $58.5M |
| THREAT SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT OFFICE OPERATIONAL TEST&EVALUATION | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2019 | $55.0M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation Federal Contracts FAQ
Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation has received $192,530,981 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation has received federal awards in multiple states.
Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation is ranked #414 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.