Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Krbcfs-maguire O'hara Joint Venture

Federal Contractor · Rank #1708

Total Federal Spending
$43.6M
$43,564,773
Total Obligations
2
Total Awards
2
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
WWYK213194 B-52 ALLIED SUPT FOR TEMP 2- DOCK HANGAR, ALC RAMPDepartment of DefenseOct 2, 2023$45.1M
WWYK230010, REPAIR HVAC, B807Department of DefenseOct 26, 2023$936K

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Krbcfs-maguire O'hara Joint Venture Federal Contracts FAQ

Krbcfs-maguire O'hara Joint Venture has received $43,564,773 in total federal obligations across 2 awards and 2 contracts.

Krbcfs-maguire O'hara Joint Venture works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Krbcfs-maguire O'hara Joint Venture has received federal awards in multiple states.

Krbcfs-maguire O'hara Joint Venture is ranked #1708 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.