L3harris Fuzing and Ordnance Systems, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #371
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR M734A1 AND M783 FUZES TO L-3 FUZING&ORDNANCE SYSTEMS INC. THE A-APA ARMY PROCUREMENT BASE AWARD IS FOR A QUANTITY OF 21,589 M734A1 MULTI-OPTION FUZES PLUS A FIRST ARTICLE TEST, AND 175,499 M783 PD/DLY FUZES. | Department of Defense | Jan 31, 2017 | $371.7M |
| ORDER FOR M762A1 ELECTRONIC TIMING FUZE PRODUCTION QUANTITIES | Department of Defense | Sep 19, 2024 | $113.3M |
| THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERY ORDER W15QKN23F0396 IS FOR THE PURCHASE OF M734A1 AND M783 FUZES. | Department of Defense | Jun 9, 2023 | $86.0M |
| M767A1 ELECTRONIC TIMING FUZES | Department of Defense | Jan 5, 2024 | $61.6M |
| TO MANUFACTURE, ASSEMBLE, TEST, INSPECT, PACKAGE, AND DELIVER THE M734A1 MULTI-OPTION FUZE FOR MORTARS (MOFM) UNDER CLIN 1005. | Department of Defense | Jul 11, 2024 | $19.5M |
| M783 PD/FLY FUZES/M734A1 MOFM FUZES | Department of Defense | Sep 18, 2024 | $5.8M |
| AN/PSS-14 NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Dec 18, 2008 | $1.3M |
| ASSEMBLY OF 1,180 PROXIMITY FUZE SENSORS WITH M151 WARHEADS. | Department of Defense | Aug 14, 2024 | $1.1M |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Jan 24, 2008 | $542K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Jan 8, 2009 | $374K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Aug 5, 2008 | $278K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Feb 11, 2008 | $209K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Apr 1, 2008 | $154K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO FOR AN/PSS-14 MINE DETECTING SET TAS::97 0100::TAS | Department of Defense | Oct 5, 2006 | $147K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Jan 4, 2008 | $133K |
| SMS MAINTENANCE TAS::97 0100::TAS | Department of Defense | Aug 27, 2007 | $115K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Jan 18, 2008 | $77K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Aug 14, 2008 | $57K |
| AN/PSS-14 NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Dec 11, 2008 | $49K |
| NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING | Department of Defense | Feb 5, 2008 | $32K |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
L3harris Fuzing and Ordnance Systems, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
L3harris Fuzing and Ordnance Systems, Inc. has received $213,471,664 in total federal obligations across 21 awards and 21 contracts.
L3harris Fuzing and Ordnance Systems, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
L3harris Fuzing and Ordnance Systems, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
L3harris Fuzing and Ordnance Systems, Inc. is ranked #371 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.