Logistics Systems Incorporated
Federal Contractor · Rank #1873
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| INFRASTRUCTURE INSTALL MOVE ADD CHANGE I2MAC | General Services Administration | Feb 2, 2024 | $55.4M |
| IGF::OT::IGF FIELD ACTIVITY SERVICES | Department of Defense | Aug 1, 2012 | $43.4M |
| IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER AWARD FOR NEXGEN MATO ON A CPFF - TERM AND COST-REIMBURSEMENT BASIS. | Department of Defense | Dec 23, 2015 | $42.9M |
| SIS SERVICE SUPPORT | Department of Defense | May 30, 2022 | $18.8M |
| STRATEGIC SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Apr 17, 2018 | $14.8M |
| ARMY DATA, ARCHITECTURE, CONTENT/KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS (DACMS). THIS EFFORT SUPPORTS DATA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT ARMY DATA MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SUPPORT, STRATEGIC SERVICES ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT, DATA CENTRIC SOLUTIONS, CONTENT / KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION SERVICES. CORE AREAS OF SERVICE INCLUDE: ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE, DATA STRATEGY, BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (BI), KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND SOFTWARE SUSTAINMENT. | Department of Defense | May 3, 2019 | $9.5M |
| IGF::OT::IGF LABOR | Department of Defense | Apr 12, 2018 | $4.2M |
| IGF::OT::IGF DOD&ARMY BUSINESS SYSTEMS SOFTWARE ENGINEERING&SUSTAINMENT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Apr 17, 2017 | $3.9M |
| IT SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Jan 1, 2021 | $3.6M |
| IGF::CT::IGF | Department of Defense | Feb 24, 2016 | $3.6M |
| DRUPAL SHAREPOINT | Department of Justice | Dec 12, 2022 | $2.9M |
| HQ AMC REQUIRES ENTERPRISE IT SERVICES. | Department of Defense | Jun 25, 2021 | $1.9M |
| OIG IT SERVICES | Department of Justice | Sep 26, 2022 | $1.8M |
| IGF::OT::IGF FLOOR MANAGER APPLICATION FOR OIF | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2015 | $1.7M |
| IT GOV SUPPORT | Department of Homeland Security | Jul 12, 2022 | $1.6M |
| THIS IS A DELIVERY ORDER FOR THE USER AND NETWORK SERVICE (UNS)/ENTERPRISE FIELD OPERATIONS (EFO) TO REFRESH PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) BY REPLACING IDENTIFIED AGING END USER WORKSTATIONS SUCH AS LAPTOPS AND DESKTOPS | Department of the Treasury | Sep 26, 2024 | $1.5M |
| TELECOMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Homeland Security | Mar 20, 2019 | $1.5M |
| ACCOUNTABLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Sep 5, 2018 | $1.3M |
| 8506866770!EBSO RECOMPETE | Department of Defense | Sep 28, 2019 | $1.2M |
| ENRD HELP DESK | Department of Justice | Sep 25, 2024 | $846K |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Logistics Systems Incorporated Federal Contracts FAQ
Logistics Systems Incorporated has received $39,463,749 in total federal obligations across 23 awards and 23 contracts.
Logistics Systems Incorporated works with 6 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, General Services Administration, Department of Justice. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Logistics Systems Incorporated has received federal awards in multiple states.
Logistics Systems Incorporated is ranked #1873 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.