Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Management Sciences for Health, Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #1679

Total Federal Spending
$44.8M
$44,783,053
Total Obligations
9
Total Awards
9
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE EXPERT TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES (LMICS) TO STRENGTHEN THE MEDICINES COMPONENT OF THEIR HEALTH SYSTEMS TO ENSURE SUSTAINABLE ACCESS TO AND APPROPRIATE USE OF SAFE, EFFECTIVE, QUALITY-ASSURED, AFFORDABLE ESSENTIAL MEDICINES AND MEDICINES-RELATED PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES.Agency for International DevelopmentSep 20, 2018$202.9M
IGF::OT::IGF THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTIVITY IS TO REDUCE MATERNAL, NEWBORN, AND CHILD MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO EXECUTE INTERVENTIONS IN HSS AND THE FOUR CORE TECHNICAL AREAS FP RH, MNCH, MALARIA, AND WASH THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE FOUR INTERRELATED AND INTERDEPENDENT INTERMEDIATE RESULTS (IRS): IR.1 ACCESS TO PRIORITY HEALTH SERVICES INCREASED IR.2 QUALITY OF PRIORITY HEALTH SERVICES IMPROVED IR.3 PERFORMANCE OF HEALTH SYSTEMS STRENGTHENED IR.4 DEMAND FOR PRIORITY HEALTH SERVICES INCREASEDAgency for International DevelopmentNov 14, 2016$103.7M
TO IMPLEMENT A FIVE YEAR U.S. PMI FOR STATES (PMI-STATES) PROGRAM IN THE STATES OF BENUE, NASARAWA, PLATEAU, AND ZAMFARA.Agency for International DevelopmentAug 13, 2020$32.3M
TO IMPLEMENT PMI FOR STATE TASK ORDER-3 HEALTH ACTIVITIES.Agency for International DevelopmentJan 10, 2020$31.9M
TASK ORDER SOLICITATION-IHS IDIQAgency for International DevelopmentJun 26, 2020$26.4M
IGF::OT::IGF - PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROJECT TO INCREASE COMMUNITY BASED PRIMARY HEALTH CARE SERVICE UPTAKE AND THE ADOPTION OF HEALTHY BEHAVIOR.Agency for International DevelopmentAug 1, 2013$24.7M
CONTRACT FOR USAID SUPPLY CHAIN STRENGTHENING ACTIVITY WITH A TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET OF $ 42,699,619 OVER FIVE YEARS. THE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED START AND END DATE IS FROM SEPTEMBER 25 2024 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 24, 2029 THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE ACTIVITY ISAgency for International DevelopmentSep 26, 2024$17.2M
TO IMPLEMENT FIVE YEAR FEDERAL LEVEL ACTIVITIESAgency for International DevelopmentNov 29, 2018$8.4M
EFFICIENT SUPPLY CHAINS ADVANCE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT (ESCAPE) ACTIVITYAgency for International DevelopmentAug 1, 2024$1.3M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Management Sciences for Health, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Management Sciences for Health, Inc. has received $44,783,053 in total federal obligations across 9 awards and 9 contracts.

Management Sciences for Health, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Agency for International Development. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Management Sciences for Health, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Management Sciences for Health, Inc. is ranked #1679 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.