Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.c.
Federal Contractor · Rank #1235
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 PANDEMIC RESPONSE AND SCENARIO PLANNING | Department of Veterans Affairs | Sep 20, 2021 | $48.8M |
| OCEA ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Sep 27, 2023 | $30.1M |
| GOCO AAP CAMPAIGN PLAN | Department of Defense | Mar 17, 2022 | $26.0M |
| SENTINEL INDUSTRIAL BASE STUDY | Department of Defense | Feb 20, 2024 | $15.3M |
| DEVELOPING AND APPLYING COMMERCIAL APPROACHES TO MISSION RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) ANALYSIS | Department of Defense | Jul 2, 2024 | $14.0M |
| THIS TASK ORDER IS FOR TRANSFORMATION SUPPORT FOR USSF SSC ORGANIZATION. | Department of Defense | Jun 12, 2023 | $12.2M |
| IGF::OT::IGF BPA: FEDERAL STUDENT AID'S NEXT GENERATION PROCESSING AND SERVICING VISIONING BPA CALL: FEDERAL STUDENT AID'S NEXT GENERATION PROCESSING AND SERVICING VISIONING FOR THE PERIOD OF 9/22/2017 TO 4/30/2018. | Department of Education | Sep 22, 2017 | $9.6M |
| THE FOCUS OF THE EFFORT SEEKS TO PROVIDE BETTER OVERSIGHT IN COST AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT; COST MODELING SERVICES; PRICING DECISIONS; AUDIT, ACCOUNTING, AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVERSIGHT; FINANCIAL, DATA, AND ECONOMIC ANALYSES USING MODELING AND CON | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2023 | $7.8M |
| SYSTEMS & WARFIGHTER ACQUISITION NAVIGATOR (SWAN) NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS): 541611 | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2024 | $7.5M |
| PROJECT NUMBER IS 002010 PROCUREMENT SPEND OPTIMIZATION. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE - BASE PERIOD: 09/27/2024 TO 09/26/2025. THE FUNDING IS FOR THE RE-PROCUREMENT OF CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES TO ASSIST CMS IN EXPANDING THE USE OF CATEGORY MANAGEMEN | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 27, 2024 | $7.2M |
| MARKET ANALYSIS | Department of Defense | Mar 13, 2023 | $5.9M |
| ENGAGE HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN - (EHCD) | Agency for International Development | Oct 1, 2018 | $5.7M |
| COMFRC CONSULTING SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Jul 17, 2023 | $4.7M |
| CUSTOMER SERVICE PROGRAM | Department of Homeland Security | Sep 28, 2018 | $2.8M |
| PKS-HILL-BECK-AIR FORCE STRATEGIC TRANSFORMATION SUPPORT (AFSTS) - FA701423STS45 - ELECTRONICS RESURGENCE INITIATIVE (ERI) TASK ORDER AWARD. | Department of Defense | Sep 21, 2023 | $2.7M |
| SPACE WARFIGHTING ARCHITECTURE NAVIGATOR (SWAN) NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS): 541611 | Department of Defense | Sep 11, 2024 | $2.2M |
| IRS CALL CENTER WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING | Department of the Treasury | May 31, 2024 | $2.2M |
| PKS-TERRY-WARD-DAFGS PHASE III AWARD | Department of Defense | Jan 4, 2021 | $2.1M |
| IGF::CT::IGF NFIP TRANSFORMATION TASK FORCE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE SUPPORT | Department of Homeland Security | Sep 30, 2015 | $1.8M |
| OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OFCIO) MANAGES THE FEDERAL IT PORTFOLIO BY CREATING ACTIONABLE POLICIES AND STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF IT IN GOVERNMENT, OVERSEEING AGENCY BUDGETING AND MANAGEMENT. | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2024 | $1.8M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.c. Federal Contracts FAQ
Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.c. has received $62,207,690 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.c. works with 9 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Education. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.c. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.c. is ranked #1235 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.