Metro Machine Corp.
Federal Contractor · Rank #167
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGF::CT::IGF EXECUTION PLANNING CVN 77 FY18 DPIA | Department of Defense | Jul 29, 2016 | $435.7M |
| USS BATAAN (LHD 5)FY 24 DSRA | Department of Defense | Mar 22, 2024 | $391.0M |
| USS IWO JIMA (LHD 7) FY22 DRY-DOCKING SELECTED RESTRICTED AVAILABILITY | Department of Defense | Dec 22, 2021 | $259.0M |
| IGF::CL::IGF USS MESA VERDE (LPD 19) DPMA | Department of Defense | Dec 22, 2017 | $171.5M |
| CNO AVAILABILITY FOR USS ARLINGTON FY23 DSRA | Department of Defense | Jan 17, 2023 | $156.6M |
| USS EISENHOWER (CVN 69) FY25 PIA | Department of Defense | Nov 12, 2024 | $122.5M |
| AWARD DELIVERY ORDER N50054-19-F-L022 | Department of Defense | Nov 18, 2019 | $103.5M |
| TYCOM WORK ITEMS | Department of Defense | Nov 28, 2022 | $86.6M |
| USS WASP (LHD-1) EM01 N0002422D4411 N5005423FL005 AWARD DELIVERY ORDER | Department of Defense | Oct 18, 2023 | $18.5M |
| THIS TASK ORDER ORDERS THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LAYBERTHING SERVICES TO THREE MARADS RRF CAPE R CLASS VESSELS, WHICH ARE MOORED AT THE CONTRACTORS LAYBERTH, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT. THIS TASK ORDER ALSO PROVIDES FUNDING ($1,754,897.00) FOR THE LAYBERTHING OF THE SAID VESSELS DURING THE BASE YEAR OF THE CONTRACT; THUS, THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS TASK ORDER IS $1,754,897.00. | Department of Transportation | Jun 21, 2019 | $12.1M |
| USS FORD (CVN 78) FY24 CIA EXECUTION | Department of Defense | Feb 20, 2024 | $8.7M |
| USS TRUMAN (CVN 75) FY24 CMAV | Department of Defense | May 4, 2024 | $7.5M |
| USS EISENHOWER (CVN 69) AP FOR FY24 PIA | Department of Defense | Jul 18, 2023 | $4.7M |
| USS EISENHOWER (CVN 69) FY24 CMAV | Department of Defense | Jul 22, 2024 | $3.3M |
| USS NIMITZ (CVN 68) FY26 STOP AP DELIVERY ORDER N5005424FP008 AWARD. | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2024 | $3.0M |
| USS FORD (CVN 78) CIA EXECUTION PLANNING | Department of Defense | Aug 11, 2023 | $2.9M |
| FY24 IAPA | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2023 | $2.7M |
| FY25 IAPA DELIVERY ORDER AWARD. | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2024 | $2.5M |
| USS IWO JIMA (LHD-7)N0002422D4411 N5005423FL034 AWARD DELIVERY ORDER | Department of Defense | Aug 7, 2023 | $2.2M |
| USS BAINBRIDGE (DDG-96) A4A4 CMAV AWARD DELIVERY ORDER N0002422D4405 N5005424FC011 | Department of Defense | Nov 30, 2023 | $1.6M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Metro Machine Corp. Federal Contracts FAQ
Metro Machine Corp. has received $524,157,405 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Metro Machine Corp. works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Transportation. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Metro Machine Corp. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Metro Machine Corp. is ranked #167 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.