Mi Technical Solutions, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #1230
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIT SBIR PHASE III FOLLOW ON | General Services Administration | Jul 30, 2020 | $195.6M |
| RMPM | Department of Defense | Sep 25, 2018 | $835K |
| RELIGIOUS MINISTRY PROGRAM SERVICES | Department of Defense | Mar 27, 2024 | $212K |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Mi Technical Solutions, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Mi Technical Solutions, Inc. has received $62,593,257 in total federal obligations across 3 awards and 3 contracts.
Mi Technical Solutions, Inc. works with 2 federal agencies, including General Services Administration, Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Mi Technical Solutions, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Mi Technical Solutions, Inc. is ranked #1230 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.