Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Minburn Technology Group, LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #103

Total Federal Spending
$927.2M
$927,241,597
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
14
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
MICROSOFT LICENSESDepartment of StateMar 1, 2024$356.0M
USSOCOM MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT LICENSE SOFTWARE ASSURANCE AND NEW LICENSESDepartment of DefenseFeb 28, 2019$284.6M
FY23 USDA OCIO ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS POP: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2023Department of AgricultureAug 16, 2022$234.7M
VA ENDPOINTS - BASE AWARD WITH OPTIONS EXERCISED AT AWARD.Department of Veterans AffairsSep 16, 2022$229.0M
MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSES AND SUPPORT (TASK ORDER 00004)Department of the TreasuryJun 1, 2024$173.0M
FY24 MICROSOFT ELA RENEWAL OPTION4 DOWO REF 15JPSS20G00000304Department of JusticeMay 1, 2024$99.5M
MICROSOFT O365 X3 LICENSESGeneral Services AdministrationMay 23, 2024$78.0M
THIS TASK ORDER IS FOR MICROSOFT M365 G5 LICENSES PER THE ATTACHED QUOTE # MTG-NASA-99010 DATED 04/27/2023.National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMay 1, 2023$67.8M
MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT AND MICROSOFT AZUREDepartment of Housing and Urban DevelopmentDec 1, 2022$64.1M
DELIVERY ORDER FOR MICROSOFT LICENSESDepartment of Housing and Urban DevelopmentDec 1, 2018$55.1M
DISA IL6 X3 MILDEPS COMBINEDGeneral Services AdministrationJun 23, 2023$51.8M
AF AADP2 LICENSESGeneral Services AdministrationJun 20, 2024$42.4M
DSS SOFTWARE, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORTDepartment of Veterans AffairsDec 15, 2023$38.5M
IRBNET COLLABORATIVE SUITE VA ENTERPRISE LICENSE REQUIREMENTDepartment of Veterans AffairsSep 23, 2019$35.1M
MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (EA)Department of LaborMar 31, 2024$31.6M
DISA DEOS IL6 SUBSCRIPTION LICENSESGeneral Services AdministrationApr 1, 2023$30.7M
AF IL6 AADP 2 LICENSESGeneral Services AdministrationMar 1, 2024$29.1M
MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE LICENSING AGREEMENT (ELA) AND MICROSOFT CONSULTING SERVICESSecurities and Exchange CommissionJun 1, 2023$23.7M
MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 AND SERVER LICENSESDepartment of DefenseMay 1, 2024$21.5M
MICROSOFT AZURESmall Business AdministrationAug 24, 2020$20.6M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Minburn Technology Group, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Minburn Technology Group, LLC has received $927,241,597 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Minburn Technology Group, LLC works with 14 federal agencies, including Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of State, Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Minburn Technology Group, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Minburn Technology Group, LLC is ranked #103 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.