Mitchell Vantage Systems LLC
Federal Contractor · Rank #1089
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNDER THIS SES III CONTRACT, THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DIVISION (SED) OF THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE (ETD) PROVIDES QUALITY SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND EXPERTISE TO ENSURE THE SUCCESS OF NASA MISSIONS AND STAKEHOLDERS. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Sep 1, 2022 | $244.7M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Mitchell Vantage Systems LLC Federal Contracts FAQ
Mitchell Vantage Systems LLC has received $71,107,227 in total federal obligations across 1 awards and 1 contracts.
Mitchell Vantage Systems LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Mitchell Vantage Systems LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.
Mitchell Vantage Systems LLC is ranked #1089 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.