Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #1033

Total Federal Spending
$74.4M
$74,385,257
Total Obligations
16
Total Awards
16
Contracts
2
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
IGF::OT::IGF LONG TERM SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE (LTS&M), INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT, ASSET MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS, AND PROGRAM-WIDE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT.Department of EnergyJan 29, 2015$428.7M
ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONS TASK ORDER FOR NEVADADepartment of EnergyNov 30, 2020$133.9M
CARLSBAD TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT YEARS 1 - 3 TASK ORDER.Department of EnergyMar 31, 2022$61.7M
SERVICES INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: DEACTIVATION, DECOMMISSIONING, DECONTAMINATION, AND DEMOLITION (D4) ACTIVITIES ACROSS SEVERAL INDUSTRIAL SITES ON THE NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE.Department of EnergyMar 31, 2023$44.3M
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE LABOR FOR THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION OMC CONTRACTDepartment of DefenseDec 1, 2021$6.1M
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SUPPORT TO THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENALDepartment of DefenseDec 1, 2022$5.4M
NRA-CONSOLIDATION OF THE ARMY ADMIN AREADepartment of DefenseApr 19, 2024$5.4M
BASE O&M DIRECT LABOR CY1Department of DefenseDec 1, 2023$5.2M
IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS-- TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE TDepartment of EnergySep 30, 2021$2.2M
NRA-CONSOL. GW TREATMENT PLANT DESIGNDepartment of DefenseApr 23, 2024$1.9M
TASK ORDER 0005 - CONSOLIDATED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT PLANTDepartment of DefenseApr 5, 2024$1.5M
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES AT THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL - WORK ORDERS AND NON-ROUTINE ACTIONSDepartment of DefenseDec 1, 2022$916K
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES AT THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL - INCENTIVE FEE POOL TASK ORDERDepartment of DefenseDec 1, 2022$439K
BASE INCENTIVE FEE CY1Department of DefenseDec 1, 2023$256K
BASE O&M MATERIAL WORK ORDERS CY1Department of DefenseDec 1, 2023$146K
BASE O&M OTHER DIRECT COSTS CY1Department of DefenseDec 1, 2023$116K

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. has received $74,385,257 in total federal obligations across 16 awards and 16 contracts.

Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Energy, Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. is ranked #1033 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.