Ohio Kepro, LLC
Federal Contractor · Rank #279
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENEFICIARY FAMILY CENTERED CARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION (BFCC-QIO) BENEFICIARY PROTECTION: CASE REVIEW SERVICES | Department of Health and Human Services | May 1, 2019 | $512.3M |
| IGF::CT::IGFTHE PURPOSE OF THE BENEFICIARY AND FAMILY CENTERED CARE (BFCC) QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION (QIO) CONTRACT IS TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE SERVICES FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES THROUGH BFCC PERFORMANCE OF NUMEROUS STATUTORY REVIEW FUNCTIONS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, QUALITY OF CARE REVIEWS, BENEFICIARY COMPLAINT REVIEWS, DISCHARGE AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE APPEALS IN VARIOUS PROVIDER SETTINGS, MEDICAL NECESSITY REVIEWS, AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT (EMTALA) REVIEWS.AREA 4PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: MAY 6, 2014 - MAY 5, 2019 | Department of Health and Human Services | May 8, 2014 | $77.2M |
| IGF::CT::IGFTHE PURPOSE OF THE BENEFICIARY AND FAMILY CENTERED CARE (BFCC) QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION (QIO) CONTRACT IS TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE SERVICES FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES THROUGH BFCC PERFORMANCE OF NUMEROUS STATUTORY REVIEW FUNCTIONS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, QUALITY OF CARE REVIEWS, BENEFICIARY COMPLAINT REVIEWS, DISCHARGE AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE APPEALS IN VARIOUS PROVIDER SETTINGS, MEDICAL NECESSITY REVIEWS, AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT (EMTALA) REVIEWS.AREA 2PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: MAY 6, 2014 - MAY 5, 2019 | Department of Health and Human Services | May 8, 2014 | $72.9M |
| IGF::CT::IGFTHE PURPOSE OF THE BENEFICIARY AND FAMILY CENTERED CARE (BFCC) QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION (QIO) CONTRACT IS TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE SERVICES FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES THROUGH BFCC PERFORMANCE OF NUMEROUS STATUTORY REVIEW FUNCTIONS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, QUALITY OF CARE REVIEWS, BENEFICIARY COMPLAINT REVIEWS, DISCHARGE AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE APPEALS IN VARIOUS PROVIDER SETTINGS, MEDICAL NECESSITY REVIEWS, AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT (EMTALA) REVIEWS.AREA 3PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: MAY 6, 2014 - MAY 5, 2019 | Department of Health and Human Services | May 8, 2014 | $65.3M |
| IGF::CT::IGF 11TH SOW BFCC NCC REQUEST FOR FUNDS TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE SERVICES OF A BENEFICIARY-AND FAMILY-CENTERED CARE (BFCC), NATIONAL COORDINATING CENTER (NCC) TO SUPPORT THE QIO 11TH SOW BASED ON CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS.ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS [15 PT MEMO, SOD, SOW AND IGCE] ARE ALREADY IN OAGM. THIS REQUISITION PROVIDES ADDITIONAL FUNDING BASED ON CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS SO THAT OAGM MAY AWARD THE CONTRACT.APP# 141372PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: "DATE OF AWARD" THRU 07/31/2019 IGF::CT::IGF | Department of Health and Human Services | Jul 25, 2014 | $6.8M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Ohio Kepro, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ
Ohio Kepro, LLC has received $298,576,424 in total federal obligations across 5 awards and 5 contracts.
Ohio Kepro, LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Health and Human Services. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Ohio Kepro, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.
Ohio Kepro, LLC is ranked #279 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.