Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Philips North America LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #463

Total Federal Spending
$172.0M
$171,961,687
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
3
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
THIS SYSTEM WOULD BE USED AND INTEGRATED WITHIN ROUTINE CARE FOR BURNS AND TRAUMATIC INJURIES, BUT WOULD ALSO HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO BE OF USE IN DETECTION VIRAL PNEUMONIA OF COVID 19 CASES.Department of Health and Human ServicesMay 8, 2020$68.2M
8510393041!PATIENT MONITORING SYSDepartment of DefenseJan 31, 2024$22.1M
PERSISTENT READINESS THROUGH EARLY PREDICTIONDepartment of DefenseFeb 18, 2021$14.9M
RAPIDLY OPERATIONALIZE THE RAPID ANALYSIS OF THREAT EXPOSURE (RATE) ALGORITHMDepartment of DefenseApr 9, 2020$14.9M
MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF PHILIPS MEDICAL IMAGING EQUIPMENTDepartment of Veterans AffairsSep 1, 2019$10.4M
PHILIPS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE MICHAEL E. DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER IN HOUSTON, TEXASDepartment of Veterans AffairsFeb 1, 2021$9.8M
8509227837!PATIENT MONITORING SYSDepartment of DefenseJul 13, 2022$9.7M
8510497804!PATIENT MONITORING SYSTEMDepartment of DefenseMar 18, 2024$8.2M
8507511467!PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITOR SYSTEMDepartment of DefenseJul 9, 2020$7.1M
8510036416!PATIENT MONTORING SYSDepartment of DefenseAug 1, 2023$6.7M
PHILIPS IMAGING ANNUAL MAINTENANCEDepartment of Veterans AffairsAug 1, 2024$6.6M
TASK ORDER 36 - PHILIPS SUSTAINMENTDepartment of Veterans AffairsAug 30, 2024$6.0M
TELECC IMPLEMENTATION FOR RICHMOND AND ASHEVILLE VAMCS. TELECC TECHNICAL AND INTERFACE SERVICES FOR THE HTM PROGRAM OFFICE.Department of Veterans AffairsAug 30, 2023$5.5M
VISN 1 - PHILLIPS RADIOLOGY EQUIPMENT SERVICE CONTRACTDepartment of Veterans AffairsNov 1, 2023$5.1M
PHILLIPS INTELLIVUE LICENSE & SUPPORT FOR VISN 23Department of Veterans AffairsOct 1, 2022$4.8M
8508842671!PATIENT MONITORING SYSDepartment of DefenseFeb 7, 2022$4.7M
SERVICE MAINTENANCE FOR PHILIPS HTME LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.Department of Veterans AffairsJan 1, 2023$4.5M
DIGITAL PATHOLOGY SYSTEMDepartment of Veterans AffairsAug 31, 2022$4.5M
ICCADepartment of Veterans AffairsMar 10, 2022$4.4M
IGF::OT::IGF PHILIPS IMAGING EQUIPMENT ANNUAL MAINTENANCE / NACDepartment of Veterans AffairsOct 1, 2017$4.2M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Philips North America LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Philips North America LLC has received $171,961,687 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Philips North America LLC works with 3 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Philips North America LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Philips North America LLC is ranked #463 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.