Precise Systems, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #515
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASE PERIOD LABOR - APN-1 | Department of Defense | Jan 3, 2022 | $52.2M |
| SUPPORT SERVICES - LABOR | Department of Defense | Jun 28, 2021 | $51.8M |
| PMA-299 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Mar 19, 2019 | $49.7M |
| BASE PERIOD LABOR | Department of Defense | Mar 20, 2020 | $49.7M |
| IGF::OT::IGF SERVICES TO SUPPORT PMA 209 COMMON ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. | Department of Defense | Dec 1, 2015 | $49.1M |
| PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES NEW TASK ORDER. | Department of Defense | Dec 31, 2019 | $47.9M |
| PMA 262 PMAC CSS | Department of Defense | Jun 1, 2022 | $47.3M |
| THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO ADDRESS Q&A RESPONSES FROM THE GOVERNMENT ADDRESSING VENDOR COMMUNITY QUESTIONS. | Department of Defense | Nov 13, 2020 | $38.8M |
| PMA280 CSS SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Sep 4, 2020 | $35.7M |
| PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES - PMA 201 FMS | Department of Defense | Mar 31, 2020 | $32.5M |
| IGF::OT::IGF ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES FOR TASKING ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTRONIC WARFARE WITHIN THE AIRBORNE DOMAIN, WITH A FOCUS ON SUSTAINMENT OF FIELDED SYSTEMS. | Department of Defense | Mar 12, 2015 | $32.1M |
| PM CSS MAC TASK ORDER FOR PMA 209 | Department of Defense | Feb 1, 2020 | $30.0M |
| BASE PERIOD LABOR - APN-7 | Department of Defense | Sep 12, 2019 | $26.1M |
| BASE PERIOD LABOR, RDT&E | Department of Defense | Sep 18, 2022 | $24.6M |
| WEAPON SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, FLEET INTERFACE, LAUNCHERS/CANISTER ENGINEERING, INSTALLATIONS, TESTING, TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION, PERSONNEL TRAINING, INTEGRATED PRODUCT SUPPORT, AND ISEA WHOLENESS | Department of Defense | Mar 16, 2023 | $23.3M |
| PMA 268 CSS SUPOORT | Department of Defense | Nov 5, 2020 | $23.0M |
| IGF::OT::IGF PMA 209 ACQ/FMS PM CSS | Department of Defense | Sep 16, 2016 | $22.2M |
| LABOR - APN-5 IGF::OT::IGF | Department of Defense | Aug 23, 2017 | $20.7M |
| IGF::OT::IGF PMA209 CAPABILITY MANAGEMENT TEAM - CONTRACTOR PROVIDED SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL AND LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PROCUREMENT AND SUSTAINMENT OF COMMON NAVAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS. THE RESULTANT CONTRACT IS EXPECTED TO BE A LEVEL-OF-EFFORT COST PLUS FIXED FEE (CPFF) CONTRACT WITH ONE BASE YEAR AND FOUR OPTIONAL PERIODS OF PERFORMANCE. | Department of Defense | Feb 1, 2017 | $20.0M |
| BASE PERIOD LABOR | Department of Defense | May 9, 2022 | $18.6M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Precise Systems, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Precise Systems, Inc. has received $152,022,856 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Precise Systems, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Precise Systems, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Precise Systems, Inc. is ranked #515 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.