Radiance Technologies Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #388
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2020 | $282.2M |
| IGF::CT::IGF | Department of Defense | Aug 9, 2016 | $92.3M |
| DISTRIBUTED, AUTOMATED, AND INTELLIGENT HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SECURITY (DAIHSS) | Department of Defense | Aug 20, 2019 | $91.9M |
| CYBER PLATFORMS AND CAPABILITIES-EFFICIENCY (CPAC-E) | Department of Defense | Sep 29, 2018 | $87.4M |
| SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SUPPORT PROGRAM - ASSESSMENT, SIMULATION, AND TRANSITION SUPPORT SERVICES. | Department of Defense | Oct 30, 2020 | $72.7M |
| SYSTEM ENGINEERING TECHNICAL AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES (SETAS) SPACE AND CYBERSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Feb 28, 2019 | $67.1M |
| THIS IS A NEW TASK ORDER UNDER D3I CONTRACT W9113M-16-D-0004. THIS TASK IS IN SUPPORT OF DIRECTED ENERGY SYSTEM INTEGRATION LABORATORY TECHNOLOGIES(DESIL).THIS EFFORT WILL VERIFY THE PERFORMANCE OF HIGH ENERGY LASER (HEL) COMPONENTS. | Department of Defense | Jul 28, 2022 | $63.7M |
| SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SUPPORT PROGRAM - ASSESSMENT, SIMULATION, AND TRANSITION SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Aug 29, 2018 | $62.8M |
| URIEL | Department of Defense | Apr 19, 2023 | $50.9M |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION OF MANUFACTURING ADVANCEMENTS OF COMPONENTS FOR HIGH ENERGY LASERS. | Department of Defense | Aug 23, 2019 | $49.1M |
| DIRECTED ENERGY COMMON TEST SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Nov 22, 2021 | $40.0M |
| RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES BASE EFFORT. REASEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS IN SUPPORT OF "INNOVATIVE LASER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS". | Department of Defense | Sep 25, 2013 | $39.3M |
| HIGH ENERGY LASER (HEL) LETHALITY ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM SUPPORT. SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SUPPORT PROGRAM | Department of Defense | Nov 30, 2018 | $37.4M |
| IGF::CT::IGF BASE AWARD | Department of Defense | Aug 10, 2015 | $31.3M |
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR HIGH ENERGY LASER APPLICATIONS (ATHELA: THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF ATHELA IS IMPROVED PERFORMANCE AND INCREASED TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVELS (TRLS) FOR LASER AND BEAM CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES. | Department of Defense | Jul 3, 2018 | $22.1M |
| OTHER FUNCTION - IGF::OT::IGF. AWARD. | Department of Defense | Apr 14, 2016 | $21.2M |
| IGF::OT::IGF - DEMAND II - SBIR III | Department of Defense | Jul 28, 2016 | $19.7M |
| AWARD OF TASK ORDER (TO) FOR US ARMY SPACE MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND (SMDC) FOR THE PROGRAM SPACE DIRECTORATE DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT.TO WILL PROVIDE CURRENT AND FUTURE GLOBAL SPACE, MISSILE DEFENSE, AND HIGH ALTITUDE (HA) CAPABILITIES. | Department of Defense | Feb 28, 2024 | $19.5M |
| TASK ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL SERVICES ON EXPRESS BPA | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2021 | $19.5M |
| U&C CONTRACT TO SUPPORT ENGINEERING AND MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR SMDC RTC. | Department of Defense | Jul 12, 2024 | $19.4M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Radiance Technologies Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Radiance Technologies Inc. has received $203,014,655 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Radiance Technologies Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Radiance Technologies Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Radiance Technologies Inc. is ranked #388 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.