Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Raytheon Southeast Asia Systems Company

Federal Contractor · Rank #565

Total Federal Spending
$138.1M
$138,119,939
Total Obligations
4
Total Awards
4
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
QATAR TANET AND DEPOT OPSDepartment of DefenseDec 1, 2023$200.1M
IGF::OT::IGF CONTRACT TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE PATRIOT MISSILE SYSTEM TO UAE.Department of DefenseJul 27, 2016$120.8M
IGF::OT::IGF PATRIOT CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF KUWAITDepartment of DefenseDec 23, 2015$72.0M
THIS IS A SERVICES REQUIREMENT FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) HOMING ALL THE WAY KILLER (HAWK) MISSILE SYSTEM PROGRAM. THIS SUPPORT SHALL BE FOR EIGHT (8) HOURS PER DAY, FIVE (5) DAYS PER WEEK.Department of DefenseJan 1, 2022$15.9M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Raytheon Southeast Asia Systems Company Federal Contracts FAQ

Raytheon Southeast Asia Systems Company has received $138,119,939 in total federal obligations across 4 awards and 4 contracts.

Raytheon Southeast Asia Systems Company works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Raytheon Southeast Asia Systems Company has received federal awards in multiple states.

Raytheon Southeast Asia Systems Company is ranked #565 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.