Regents of the University of California, the
Federal Contractor · Rank #1950
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&O OF LANL BR OF U OF CA | Department of Energy | Sep 30, 1978 | $35.3B |
| PHASE A THROUGH F - ICON. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCB) AT BERKELEY SPACE SCIENCES LABORATORY, THE PRIME CONTRACTUAL INTERFACE FOR NASA FOR THE IONOSPHERIC CONNECTION EXPLORER (LCON) MISSION INVESTIGATION TEAM, THAT COVERS PHASE A OF THE MISSION. THE NASA AO IS NNHIIZDA0020. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) DR. THOMAS IMMEL, UCB WILL BE THE PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR TO NASA FOR ICON. UCB SHALL CONDUCT THE PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONCEPT STUDY GUIDELINES. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS STUDY, THE ICON TEAM SHALL: A. CONDUCT TRADE AND RISK REDUCTION STUDIES; B. UPDATE AND REFINE THE EXISTING MISSION COST ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL PLAN; C. INTEGRATE AND DELIVER TO NASA ALL SUBCONTRACTOR AND UCB FINANCIAL REPORTS; D. DEVELOP PLAN FOR EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT TO BE IN PLACE DURING PHASES C AND D; E. DEVELOP THE MISSION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PHASE B/CID, AND E; F. DEFME THE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOP MITIGATION STRATEGIES; G. OUTLINE THE FABRICATION, INTEGRATION, TEST, AND OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM; H. DEFINE THE EDUCATION, OUTREACH, TECHNOLOGY, AND SMALL BUSINESS DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS PLANS; I. DEVELOP A PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (PAIP); J. DEVELOP A PRELIMINARY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN; K. DOCUMENT THE RESULTS OF THE STUDIES IN THE PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY REPORT; AND L. PRESENT THE ICON CONCEPT TO THE NASA ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jan 11, 2012 | $182.1M |
| THE COMPTON SPECTROMETER AND IMAGER (COSI) | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Mar 23, 2021 | $117.7M |
| GLOBAL LYMAN-ALPHA IMAGERS OF THE DYNAMIC EXOSPHERE (GLIDE) INSTRUMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT (PHASE B) SUPPORT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Feb 10, 2021 | $77.5M |
| ESCAPE AND PLASMA ACCELERATION AND DYNAMICS EXPLORERS (ESCAPADE) MISSION -.PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Aug 21, 2019 | $66.7M |
| THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, DEVELOP, AND DELIVER AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE LUNAR SURFACE ELECTROMAGNETICS EXPERIMENT AT NIGHT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Aug 17, 2022 | $15.5M |
| THE STIS INSTRUMENT IS AN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC-GRADE FLIGHT INSTRUMENT THAT WILL BE DESIGNED AND DEVELOPED TO OPERATE IN THE INTERPLANETARY ENVIRONMENT AT LAGRANGE L1 APPROXIMATELY 1M MILES FROM EARTH TOWARDS THE SUN ON THE EARTH-SUN LINE | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Apr 30, 2020 | $9.0M |
| DESIGN OF HIGH CONFIDENCE LEARNING-ENABLED SYSTEMS (HICON-LEARN) | Department of Defense | May 1, 2018 | $8.1M |
| LOGICS: LEARNING-DRIVEN ORACLE-GUIDED COMPOSITIONAL SYMBIOTIC DESIGN OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Sep 29, 2020 | $4.6M |
| UCB SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE SPAN-AI INSTRUMENT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Apr 7, 2021 | $4.6M |
| PROVABLY CORRECT DESIGN OF ADAPTIVE HYBRID NEURO-SYMBOLIC CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Jun 30, 2023 | $4.2M |
| THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAD THE LUNAR SURFACE ELECTROMAGNETICS EXPERIMENT MISSION INVESTIGATION AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND DELIVERY OF INSTRUMENT, GENERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTS. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Dec 18, 2019 | $3.6M |
| REAL QUANTUM INSPIRED CLASSICAL COMPUTING | Department of Defense | Feb 3, 2023 | $3.5M |
| SERDP PROJECT RC21-1034 | Department of Defense | Sep 13, 2021 | $2.7M |
| UCB SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE SOLID STATE TELESCOPE (SST) INSTRUMENT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jun 1, 2021 | $2.0M |
| UCB SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE SPAN-BE INSTRUMENT | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jun 2, 2021 | $1.9M |
| R&D PROJECT: ER20-1330 | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2020 | $1.5M |
| FIRE WHIRL STUDY-PHASE 2 | Department of the Interior | Jan 18, 2021 | $1.5M |
| EVALUATING ROBUST STANDARDIZABLE METHODS FOR WASTEWATER SURVEILLANCE OF PATHOGENS AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 30, 2022 | $1.1M |
| AWARD OF SERDP PROJECT ER23-3827 "ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL FACTORS CONTROLLING BIOTRANSFORMATION OF CATIONIC AND ZWITTERIONIC PRECURSORS IN PFAS SOURCE ZONES" | Department of Defense | Jan 25, 2024 | $1.0M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Regents of the University of California, the Federal Contracts FAQ
Regents of the University of California, the has received $37,919,191 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Regents of the University of California, the works with 6 federal agencies, including Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Regents of the University of California, the has received federal awards in multiple states.
Regents of the University of California, the is ranked #1950 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.