Regents of the University of California, the
Federal Contractor · Rank #1938
Regents of the University of California, the Federal Spending Profile
Regents of the University of California, the is a smaller federal recipient, with $37.9M in total federal obligations across 25 awards in the USAspending.gov record. That places Regents of the University of California, the #1938 among federal contractors ranked by total obligations.
Every one of Regents of the University of California, the's 25 federal awards is a procurement contract rather than a grant — the company sells goods or services to the government rather than receiving grant funding.
Regents of the University of California, the's federal business is heavily concentrated in one customer: Department of Energy accounts for roughly 98% of its top-agency obligations, with National Aeronautics and Space Administration a distant second. Across the full record the company works with 6 agencies, but a single relationship dominates the dollars.
What the federal government buys from Regents of the University of California, the is led by Other Services ($35.6B), followed by IT & Software ($208.4M); together these categories describe the goods and services the company is paid to deliver.
Its largest single recent award is a $35.3B contract from the Department of Energy, described in the federal record as "M&O Of Lanl Br Of U Of Ca."
Track Regents of the University of California, the
Subscribe for TaxDollarData updates by email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&O OF LANL BR OF U OF CA | Department of Energy | Sep 30, 1978 | $35.3B |
| TIME HISTORY OF EVENTS&MACROSCALE INTERACTIONS DURING SUBSTORMS (THEMIS) MISSION PHASE A EFFORT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CONCEPT STUDY FOR THE THEMIS MISSION IN ORDER TO PROVIDE NASA WITH MORE DEFINITIVE INFORMATION REGARDING THE COST, RISK, AND FEASIBILITY OF THE INVESTIGATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND DELIVER A CONCEPT STUDY REPORT DETAILING THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT B OF THE CONTRACT ENTITLED "MEDIUM-CLASS EXPLORER PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR THE PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY". THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO SUPPORT A NASA SITE VISIT AT ITS FACILITY TO DISCUSS THE CONCEPT STUDY REPORT AND ATTEND A PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY REVIEW MEETING, BRIDGE PHASE OPTION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMMENCE INITIAL DEFINITION PHASE ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING LONG LEAD PARTS PROCUREMENTS. AND THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: - PROVIDE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FOR THEMIS - BEGIN SCIENTIFIC STUDIES AND SIMULATIONS TO PROVIDE SCIENTIFIC INPUT FOR INSTRUMENT AND ORBIT DESIGN ENSURING THEY MEET SCIENCE GOALS - BEGIN THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUMENTS, OTHER HARDWARE, AND ELECTRONICS AND - BEGIN FLIGHT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jul 15, 2002 | $199.5M |
| PHASE A THROUGH F - ICON. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCB) AT BERKELEY SPACE SCIENCES LABORATORY, THE PRIME CONTRACTUAL INTERFACE FOR NASA FOR THE IONOSPHERIC CONNECTION EXPLORER (LCON) MISSION INVESTIGATION TEAM, THAT COVERS PHASE A OF THE MISSION. THE NASA AO IS NNHIIZDA0020. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) DR. THOMAS IMMEL, UCB WILL BE THE PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR TO NASA FOR ICON. UCB SHALL CONDUCT THE PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONCEPT STUDY GUIDELINES. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS STUDY, THE ICON TEAM SHALL: A. CONDUCT TRADE AND RISK REDUCTION STUDIES B. UPDATE AND REFINE THE EXISTING MISSION COST ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL PLAN C. INTEGRATE AND DELIVER TO NASA ALL SUBCONTRACTOR AND UCB FINANCIAL REPORTS D. DEVELOP PLAN FOR EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT TO BE IN PLACE DURING PHASES C AND D E. DEVELOP THE MISSION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PHASE B/CID, AND E F. DEFME THE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOP MITIGATION STRATEGIES G. OUTLINE THE FABRICATION, INTEGRATION, TEST, AND OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM H. DEFINE THE EDUCATION, OUTREACH, TECHNOLOGY, AND SMALL BUSINESS DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS PLANS I. DEVELOP A PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (PAIP) J. DEVELOP A PRELIMINARY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN K. DOCUMENT THE RESULTS OF THE STUDIES IN THE PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY REPORT AND L. PRESENT THE ICON CONCEPT TO THE NASA ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jan 11, 2012 | $182.1M |
| THE COMPTON SPECTROMETER AND IMAGER (COSI) | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Mar 23, 2021 | $130.9M |
| GLOBAL LYMAN-ALPHA IMAGERS OF THE DYNAMIC EXOSPHERE (GLIDE) INSTRUMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT (PHASE B) SUPPORT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Feb 10, 2021 | $78.5M |
| ESCAPE AND PLASMA ACCELERATION AND DYNAMICS EXPLORERS (ESCAPADE) MISSION -.PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Aug 21, 2019 | $66.7M |
| THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, DEVELOP, AND DELIVER AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE LUNAR SURFACE ELECTROMAGNETICS EXPERIMENT AT NIGHT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Aug 17, 2022 | $15.5M |
| THE STIS INSTRUMENT IS AN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC-GRADE FLIGHT INSTRUMENT THAT WILL BE DESIGNED AND DEVELOPED TO OPERATE IN THE INTERPLANETARY ENVIRONMENT AT LAGRANGE L1 APPROXIMATELY 1M MILES FROM EARTH TOWARDS THE SUN ON THE EARTH-SUN LINE | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Apr 30, 2020 | $9.2M |
| DESIGN OF HIGH CONFIDENCE LEARNING-ENABLED SYSTEMS (HICON-LEARN) | Department of Defense | May 1, 2018 | $8.1M |
| UCB SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE SPAN-AI INSTRUMENT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Apr 7, 2021 | $4.7M |
| LOGICS: LEARNING-DRIVEN ORACLE-GUIDED COMPOSITIONAL SYMBIOTIC DESIGN OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Sep 29, 2020 | $4.6M |
| PROVABLY CORRECT DESIGN OF ADAPTIVE HYBRID NEURO-SYMBOLIC CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Jun 30, 2023 | $4.2M |
| THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAD THE LUNAR SURFACE ELECTROMAGNETICS EXPERIMENT MISSION INVESTIGATION AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND DELIVERY OF INSTRUMENT, GENERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTS. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Dec 18, 2019 | $3.6M |
| REAL QUANTUM INSPIRED CLASSICAL COMPUTING | Department of Defense | Feb 3, 2023 | $3.5M |
| SERDP PROJECT RC21-1034 | Department of Defense | Sep 13, 2021 | $3.0M |
| UCB SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE SOLID STATE TELESCOPE (SST) INSTRUMENT. | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jun 1, 2021 | $2.0M |
| UCB SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE SPAN-BE INSTRUMENT | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jun 2, 2021 | $1.9M |
| R&D PROJECT: ER20-1330 | Department of Defense | Sep 30, 2020 | $1.5M |
| FIRE WHIRL STUDY-PHASE 2 | Department of the Interior | Jan 18, 2021 | $1.5M |
| EVALUATING ROBUST STANDARDIZABLE METHODS FOR WASTEWATER SURVEILLANCE OF PATHOGENS AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 30, 2022 | $1.1M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Regents of the University of California, the Federal Contracts FAQ
Regents of the University of California, the has received $37,919,191 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Regents of the University of California, the works with 6 federal agencies, including Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Regents of the University of California, the has received federal awards in multiple states.
Regents of the University of California, the is ranked #1938 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.