Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Relx Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #1142

Total Federal Spending
$68.2M
$68,168,362
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
10
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
LEXUSNEXIS PROMONITOR SUBSCRIPTIONDepartment of DefenseMar 28, 2019$44.7M
ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH PLATFORM AND COURT DOCUMENT SUBSCRIPTIONSecurities and Exchange CommissionAug 1, 2019$17.0M
EXTERNAL VALIDATION SERVICES/LEXISNEXIS FOR A BASE YEAR AND 4 ONE-YEAR OPTIONS.Department of StateMar 18, 2023$15.3M
SUBSCRIPTION TO A LEGAL RESEARCH PLATFORM INCLUDING FULL TEXT NEWS, A PUBLIC RECORDS DATABASE, COURT DOCKET FILES, AND A DISCLOSURE RESEARCH DATABASE.Securities and Exchange CommissionAug 1, 2024$12.5M
ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH DATABASE - LEXISNEXISDepartment of CommerceSep 27, 2019$12.2M
THIS IS A RENEWAL OF AN ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION TO THE LEXIS, COURTLINK, AND ACCURINT DATABASES. BASE YEAR, WITH 4 OPTION YEARS.Social Security AdministrationSep 24, 2024$11.4M
CALR-5 - LEGAL DATABASEDepartment of JusticeOct 1, 2023$8.2M
CALR-5Department of JusticeOct 1, 2023$8.1M
CALR-5Department of JusticeOct 1, 2023$8.1M
CALR-5Department of JusticeOct 1, 2022$6.0M
THIS IS A RENEWAL OF AN ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION TO THE LEXIS+, COURTLINK, AND ACCURINT DATABASES. THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IS 9/29/2023 TO 9/28/2024.Social Security AdministrationJul 31, 2023$5.5M
COMPUTER ASSISTED LEGAL RESEARCH (CALR) FOR DOD ORGANIZATIONS: AFLOA, NAVY, ARMY, USMC, DLA, DCMA, DCAADepartment of DefenseApr 1, 2020$5.5M
THIS IS A RENEWAL OF AN ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FROM LEXISNEXIS TO THE LEXIS+, ACCURINT, AND COURTLINK DATABASES.Social Security AdministrationSep 20, 2022$5.4M
ONLINE SUBSCRIPTIONExecutive Office of the PresidentDec 27, 2022$5.2M
IGF::OT::IGF SUBSCRIPTION SERVICESFederal Trade CommissionOct 1, 2017$5.2M
SUBSCRIPTION TO THE LEXIS+, ACCURINT AND COURTLINK DATABASES.Social Security AdministrationSep 24, 2021$5.1M
LEXISNEXIS COMPREHENSIVE ONLINE SERVICESDepartment of StateSep 13, 2019$4.8M
LEGAL REFERENCE LIBRARYFederal Trade CommissionOct 1, 2022$4.4M
CALR-5, THIS ORDER REPLACES 15JPSS19F00000900Department of JusticeDec 12, 2019$4.1M
RENEWAL FOR ON-LINE LEGAL SERVICES IGF::OT::IGFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 16, 2018$3.0M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Relx Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Relx Inc. has received $68,168,362 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Relx Inc. works with 10 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Relx Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Relx Inc. is ranked #1142 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.