Rmi Titanium Company, LLC
Federal Contractor · Rank #1373
Watch Rmi Titanium Company, LLC for new federal awards
We'll email you the moment Rmi Titanium Company, LLC changes. No spam — only real updates.
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| TITANIUM INGOTS | Department of Defense | Oct 18, 2023 | $55.0M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Rmi Titanium Company, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ
Rmi Titanium Company, LLC has received $54,964,162 in total federal obligations across 1 awards and 1 contracts.
Rmi Titanium Company, LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Rmi Titanium Company, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.
Rmi Titanium Company, LLC is ranked #1373 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.