Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Rmi Titanium Company, LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #1384

Total Federal Spending
$55.0M
$54,964,162
Total Obligations
1
Total Awards
1
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
TITANIUM INGOTSDepartment of DefenseOct 18, 2023$55.0M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Rmi Titanium Company, LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Rmi Titanium Company, LLC has received $54,964,162 in total federal obligations across 1 awards and 1 contracts.

Rmi Titanium Company, LLC works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Rmi Titanium Company, LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Rmi Titanium Company, LLC is ranked #1384 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.