Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Serco-ips Corporation

Federal Contractor · Rank #1163

Total Federal Spending
$66.8M
$66,812,626
Total Obligations
10
Total Awards
10
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
SHIP DESIGN SERVICESDepartment of DefenseDec 19, 2008$300.2M
BASE YEAR SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseSep 11, 2018$247.8M
SUPPORT TO THE PROGRAM OFFICE WILL ASSIST IN THEIR EFFORTS TO SATISFY BOTH CURRENT AND FUTURE NAVY/MARINE CORPS NEEDS FOR AMPHIBIOUS WARFARE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY A FULL RANGE OF PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES ACROSS ALL OF PMS377 S HIGHLY INTERRELATED PRODUCT LINES IN THE AREAS OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, LOGISTICS, TEST AND EVALUATION (T&E), BUSINESS/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT/GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFE/GFI).Department of DefenseJul 18, 2011$227.3M
PMS 377, PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES (PSS) IN THE AREAS OF T&E, TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT, ACQUISITION AND LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT, LANDING CRAFT PLANNING YARD SUPPORT, INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT (ILS), GFE SUPPORT, AND FLEET SUPPORT.Department of DefenseSep 9, 2019$209.9M
IGF::OT::IGF SHIP DESIGN SERVICESDepartment of DefenseSep 2, 2015$171.7M
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PMS515 FFGX PROGRAM.Department of DefenseAug 19, 2019$70.0M
IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NAVSEA NAVAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE (SEA 05) FOR AIRCRAFT CARRIER SHIP DESIGN, INTEGRATION, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT; SURFACE COMBATANT SHIP DESIGN, INTEGRATION, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT; AMPHIBIOUS AND AUXILIARY SHIP DESIGN, INTEGRATION, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT; AND WARFARE SYSTEM, CONTROL SYSTEM AND COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS, COMBAT SYSTEMS, AND INTEROPERABILITY (C5I) SYSTEM SUPPORT.Department of DefenseJul 17, 2017$66.7M
SHIP DESIGN SERVICESDepartment of DefenseJul 29, 2022$44.0M
IGF::OT::IGF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE INSTALLATION DESIGN SERVICES ALLOCATION (DSA), SYSTEM HARDWARE DESIGN, INSTALLATION SUPPORT, AND MATERIAL KITTING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF FLEET MODERNIZATION PROGRAM (FMP) PLANS OF THE LAND ATTACK DEPARTMENT AND SELF DEFENSE TEST SHIP AT THE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER PORT HUENEME DIVISION.Department of DefenseAug 18, 2017$38.3M
AUTONOMOUS MARITIME SYSTEMS TEST CENTER (AMSTC) ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICESDepartment of DefenseSep 26, 2018$29.7M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Serco-ips Corporation Federal Contracts FAQ

Serco-ips Corporation has received $66,812,626 in total federal obligations across 10 awards and 10 contracts.

Serco-ips Corporation works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Serco-ips Corporation has received federal awards in multiple states.

Serco-ips Corporation is ranked #1163 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.