Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #316
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUKUS PROGRAM OFFICE SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Mar 29, 2023 | $150.6M |
| RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES | Department of Defense | Jul 7, 2021 | $150.2M |
| FOREIGN INVESTMENT RISK PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Sep 28, 2019 | $123.5M |
| SHALL PROVIDE ENG, TECH, AND PROF SUPP SERV TO IWS 2.0 IN THE AREA OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FOR ALL IWS 2.0 PROGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROVIDE ENG, TECH, AND PROF SUPP SERV IN THE AREAS OF ENG AND T&E FOR DEV OF ADVANCED AND FUTURE SENSOR SYSTEMS. | Department of Defense | Dec 8, 2022 | $113.3M |
| ODCS FOR OPERATIONAL CLINS | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2020 | $84.3M |
| REPORTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES. CLINS 0001, 1001, 2005, 30005, AND 4005 ARE NON-SEVERABLE AND CONTAIN UK NON-FMS FUNDS. CANNOT DIVIDE IN SYSTEM. AMOUNT INCLUDED IN TRANSACTION 4. | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2018 | $62.9M |
| CONSOLIDATION AND FOLLOW-ON FOR 17C0004 AND 17C0011 TTP INTEGRATOR. EO14042 | Department of Defense | Nov 1, 2021 | $49.8M |
| FY24 ODC & TRAVEL IN SUPPORT OF CLIN0001 | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2023 | $44.3M |
| EXECUTIVE LEVEL SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Feb 25, 2021 | $37.2M |
| IGF::OT::IGF FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS FY17 NWS ACQ&OPERATION SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Nov 1, 2016 | $34.7M |
| NUCLEAR WEAPON SURETY SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Apr 1, 2020 | $32.6M |
| SLCM-N SPA UCA CONTRACT | Department of Defense | Jul 12, 2024 | $32.5M |
| PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE OFFICE OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY | Department of Defense | Feb 5, 2021 | $23.6M |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS TASK FORCE SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Apr 1, 2023 | $22.4M |
| DARPA JANUS PROGRAM | Department of Defense | Dec 6, 2022 | $20.6M |
| ENGINEERING, OPERATIONAL, TECHNICAL, ANALYTICAL, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMS DIRECTLY RELATED TO SUBMARINE SECURITY | Department of Defense | Dec 7, 2018 | $16.2M |
| ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES (A&AS) IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE-AIR FORCES IN AFRICA (U-A) PLANS, PROGRAMS, AND ANALYSIS DIRECTORATE | Department of Defense | Sep 1, 2023 | $10.8M |
| DETER OPEN ARA PERSIST | Department of Defense | Apr 25, 2024 | $10.8M |
| OPNAV SSTP SUPPORT SERVICES | Department of Defense | Nov 9, 2023 | $10.5M |
| BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | Department of Defense | Jun 1, 2023 | $10.3M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. has received $259,562,945 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. is ranked #316 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.